| Код ТН ВЭД | 870179 |
Как аккредитованная фабрика по производству глицил-л-лейцина, мы соблюдаем строгие протоколы качества - каждая партия подвергается строгим испытаниям для обеспечения последовательных стандартов эффективности и безопасности.
| Упаковка | |
| Доставка | |
| Хранение |
Конкурентные цены на глицил-л-лейцин, которые соответствуют вашему бюджету - гибкие условия и индивидуальные котировки для каждого заказа.
Для получения образцов, цен или более подробной информации свяжитесь с нами по адресу +8618136850665 или отправить по почте admin@ascent-chem.com.
Мы ответим вам как можно скорее.
Телефон: +8618136850665
Электронная почта: admin@ascent-chem.com
Гибкие условия оплаты, конкурентоспособные цены, первоклассное обслуживание — обращайтесь прямо сейчас!
Glycyl-L-leucine (Gly-Leu; N-glycyl-L-leucine; CAS 869-19-2) is a chiral dipeptide formed from glycine and L-leucine through a standard peptide bond. The molecular formula is C8H16N2O3, the average molecular weight is 188.23 g/mol, and the monoisotopic mass is 188.116 Da. The IUPAC name is (S)-2-(2-aminoacetamido)-4-methylpentanoic acid. In bulk and research supply chains, the product appears as a white to off-white crystalline powder; catalog model numbers are manufacturer-specific and typically encode purity tier, packaging size, and certification package rather than a single universal designation. The compound is used as a defined dipeptide substrate in aminopeptidase assays, as a hydrolysis-prone model in oligopeptide-transport experiments, and as an experimental leucine-donating component in cell culture media. No harmonized USP, EP, or JP monograph exists for glycyl-L-leucine, so product quality is specified through supplier certificates of analysis and should be evaluated against the intended assay or formulation protocol.
Glycyl-L-leucine contains one chiral center at the L-leucine α-carbon; this feature is absent in glycylglycine and inverted in glycyl-D-leucine. The isobutyl side chain of the leucine residue increases reversed-phase chromatographic retention and reduces aqueous solubility relative to glycine-based dipeptides. Unlike free L-leucine, the compound is transported and hydrolyzed through dipeptide-specific pathways before releasing the amino acid. Glycylglycine is achiral and used mainly as a buffer component, while glycyl-L-leucine is selected when stereochemically defined peptide cleavage or transport is under study. The table summarizes structural and functional contrasts for compounds commonly encountered in similar biochemical workflows.
| Compound | CAS registry | Molecular formula | Molecular weight | Chiral centers | Typical biochemical role |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glycyl-L-leucine | 869-19-2 | C8H16N2O3 | 188.23 g/mol | 1 L | Hydrolysis-prone dipeptide substrate |
| Glycylglycine | 556-50-3 | C4H8N2O3 | 132.12 g/mol | 0 | Achiral buffer and control dipeptide |
| L-Leucine | 61-90-5 | C6H13NO2 | 131.17 g/mol | 1 L | Free amino acid; amino acid transporter substrate |
| Glycine | 56-40-6 | C2H5NO2 | 75.07 g/mol | 0 | Free amino acid; media buffer component |
As a substrate for leucine aminopeptidase (EC 3.4.11.1), glycyl-L-leucine is hydrolyzed to glycine and L-leucine. Quantitative release of L-leucine can be monitored with ninhydrin detection at 570 nm or coupled to L-leucine dehydrogenase with NADH absorbance at 340 nm. The peptide bond is susceptible to hydrolysis, so assay buffers above pH 7.5, incubation times above 30 min at 37 °C, or residual divalent metal ions can increase background cleavage and reduce the signal window. For oligopeptide-transporter studies, glycyl-L-leucine serves as a hydrolysis-prone substrate for PEPT1/SLC15A1 and related isoforms, whereas glycylsarcosine is used when intracellular hydrolysis must be suppressed. Published apparent affinity constants for glycyl-L-leucine transport vary with expression system; apparent Km values are frequently observed in the 0.1–2.0 mM range, but each experimental platform requires independent kinetic validation. This difference is operationally important because free L-leucine generated inside cells can feedback-regulate amino acid sensing pathways and confound transport kinetics if not accounted for.
Release criteria for glycyl-L-leucine are set by non-harmonized fine-chemical methods rather than a pharmacopoeial monograph. High-purity material is commonly released at 98.0–99.0% area purity by HPLC-UV, with identity confirmed by FTIR and optical rotation. Specific rotation values in supplier documentation are not harmonized; they are commonly reported near −35° at c = 2 in water, but the lot-specific certificate must be used as the operative value. The analytical hierarchy applied to incoming quality control should distinguish among purity, impurity profile, water content, and elemental burden. A peptide-like impurity that is not resolved by a generic area-percent HPLC method may still interfere in enzyme assays or cell culture growth studies. Therefore, the certificate of analysis should be read in conjunction with the specific downstream detection limit and the impurity tolerance of the biological model. System suitability criteria for chromatographic release commonly include resolution between glycyl-L-leucine and L-leucine of not less than 2.0, tailing factor not more than 1.5, and plate count not less than 2000 on a 5 µm C18 column.
| Attribute | Method basis | Typical supplier criterion |
|---|---|---|
| Identity | FTIR; optical rotation | Matches reference spectrum; rotation supplier-defined |
| Assay/purity | HPLC-UV at 214 nm | 98.0–99.0% area purity |
| Water content | Karl Fischer | ≤0.5% where specified |
| Residue on ignition | Sulfated ash, USP <281> | ≤0.1% where specified |
| Elemental impurities | ICP-MS, USP <232> | Supplier-specific; no monograph |
| Residual solvents | GC-HS, USP <467> | ICH Q3C options |
The criteria shown are not harmonized; they represent common supply-chain practices and require lot-specific verification. No ACS, USP, or EP monograph assigns legal release limits to this compound. For compositional verification, vapor-phase hydrolysis with 6 M HCl at 110 °C for 24 h releases glycine and L-leucine for amino acid analysis, which provides an orthogonal check on the claimed dipeptide structure.
In chemically defined media, dipeptides can replace free amino acids to reduce osmotic pressure, limit free amino acid reactivity, or improve heat stability during media preparation. When glycyl-L-leucine is evaluated as a leucine source, the effective leucine delivery depends on dipeptide transport and intracellular hydrolase activity in the target cell line. Published data for this specific configuration is limited; glycyl-L-leucine is not established as the sole leucine source in widely adopted commercial media. The molar conversion basis is 188.23 g/mol of dipeptide providing 131.17 g/mol of L-leucine after complete hydrolysis, equivalent to 1.435 g of Gly-Leu per 1 g of L-leucine. This calculation assumes stoichiometric cleavage and conversion; actual availability depends on hydrolase capacity, and residual intact dipeptide should be tracked in spent medium if accumulation is suspected. Because one mole of glycyl-L-leucine also releases one mole of glycine, glycine-restricted or glycine-sensitive media formulations require an additional adjustment to avoid unintended shift in the glycine pool.
Physicochemical behavior in aqueous solution controls stock-solution design. Glycyl-L-leucine is zwitterionic; the terminal carboxyl pKa is estimated in the range 3.1–3.4, the terminal amino pKa in the range 7.9–8.2, and the isoelectric point lies near pH 5.5–5.8. Solubility in water is moderate but sufficient for stock solutions at 20–50 mM; higher concentrations may require gentle warming below 40 °C and pH adjustment away from the isoelectric point. Phosphate-buffered saline at pH 7.4 is compatible for short-term assay use, but prolonged aqueous storage can generate free glycine and L-leucine through slow hydrolytic cleavage even at 2–8 °C.
Measuring initial-rate hydrolysis of glycyl-L-leucine requires control of enzyme source, metal cofactor, and detection window. Leucine aminopeptidase activity is often activated by Zn2+ or Mn2+; buffers containing EDTA or other strong chelators should be avoided because they suppress activity and obscure substrate conversion. When HPLC is used instead of a coupled enzymatic readout, gradient elution on a C18 column with UV detection at 214 nm separates glycyl-L-leucine from L-leucine, while glycine requires pre-column derivatization or an orthogonal detector because free glycine lacks a strong UV chromophore. A common chromatographic starting point is a 250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm C18 column operated at 25 °C with a 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid/acetonitrile gradient. A linear calibration range is typically verified over 0.05–5.0 mM for HPLC-UV methods; values outside this range require dilution or concentration. High substrate concentrations may inhibit some aminopeptidase isoforms, and low concentrations below the validated limit yield unreliable initial slopes because detector noise limits integration at peptide wavelengths.
Thermal stress during storage and drying influences peptide integrity. Glycyl-L-leucine is typically stored desiccated at 2–8 °C for working quantities and at −20 °C or lower for reference standards; repeated freeze-thaw cycles should be avoided because moisture uptake can accelerate hydrolysis and produce batch-to-batch drift in enzyme assays. Thermal analysis generally shows decomposition rather than a sharp melting point; exact onset varies with lot purity and heating rate. Incompatibilities include strong oxidizing agents and strongly alkaline solutions. Autoclaving aqueous solutions is generally unsuitable unless stability has been demonstrated for the specific vessel, pH, and hold time. For aseptic filtration, a 0.22 µm membrane is appropriate after confirming that adsorption losses are acceptable for the target concentration.
For applications requiring cGMP or clinical-grade material, the absence of a glycyl-L-leucine monograph places burden on the end user to qualify the supplier and validate release methods. Compendial test chapters such as USP <232>, USP <467>, and USP <281> are commonly applied to support raw-material release even though the compound itself is non-compendial. Residual solvent limits are typically assessed under ICH Q3C options, and elemental impurity limits should follow ICH Q3D risk-based routes. Supplier audit documentation should include method validation summaries, tissue-of-origin declarations, and evidence of batch-to-batch consistency for optical rotation and chromatographic purity.
Packaging commonly spans 1 g to 1 kg for research grades; process-scale lots are typically packed in double polyethylene liners inside fiber drums with desiccant. Bulk material should be opened under low-humidity conditions when tight moisture limits are specified, and dry powder handling should be conducted with local exhaust ventilation if dust generation is anticipated.