Продукты

Clariant Thermoplastic Polyvinyl Alcohol 3D Printer Filament

    • Название продукта: Clariant Thermoplastic Polyvinyl Alcohol 3D Printer Filament
    • Сайт Factroy: Округ Юду, Ганьчжоу, Цзянси, Китай
    • Запрос цены: admin@ascent-chem.com
    • Производитель: Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited
    • Свяжитесь сейчас
    Спецификации
    Код ТН ВЭД 780157

    Как аккредитованный завод Clariant Thermoplastic Polyvinyl Alcohol 3D Printer Filament, мы соблюдаем строгие протоколы качества - каждая партия подвергается строгим испытаниям для обеспечения последовательных стандартов эффективности и безопасности.

    Упаковка и хранение
    Упаковка Sealed moisture-barrier foil bag contains one 500 g spool of Clariant Thermoplastic Polyvinyl Alcohol 3D Printer Filament, plus desiccant.
    Погрузка контейнера (20-футовый контейнер) 20′ FCL container loading: palletized Clariant thermoplastic polyvinyl alcohol 3D printer filament, shrink-wrapped, securely braced and stowed for transport.
    Доставка Clariant Thermoplastic Polyvinyl Alcohol 3D Printer Filament ships as a non-hazardous, non-DG solid. Each spool is vacuum-sealed with desiccant in a moisture-barrier bag and packed in a sturdy box. Store and transport at ambient temperature, away from moisture, heat, and direct sunlight. No special transport permits required.
    Хранение Store Clariant Thermoplastic Polyvinyl Alcohol 3D Printer Filament in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area away from direct sunlight, heat, and ignition sources. Keep sealed in original packaging or an airtight container with desiccant to prevent moisture absorption. Maintain temperatures around 15–25°C and low humidity. Avoid prolonged exposure to humid air, as PVA is hygroscopic.
    Срок годности Clariant PVA filament shelf life: about 12 months if kept sealed with desiccant in a cool, dry, dark place; moisture-sensitive.
    Применение термопластической поливиниловой спиртной нити 3D-принтера Clariant

    Clariant thermoplastic polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) filament is deployed as a sacrificial support material in multi-material fused filament fabrication for PLA-based functional prototypes where internal cavities, snap-fit undercuts, and overhangs above 45° from vertical cannot be produced with breakaway supports without damaging fine surface features. The PVA support is printed from a dedicated tool head at 190–210°C onto a build plate held at 45–60°C, with a solid interface layer at 100% density and a horizontal offset of 0.1–0.2 mm from the PLA build surface; the bulk support region is commonly set to 15–25% rectilinear infill to reduce water dissolution time after printing. PVA filament must be pre-dried at 60°C for 4–8 h when ambient relative humidity exceeds 50%, because moisture uptake determined by ASTM D570-98(2021) can exceed 0.5 wt% within 12 h in uncontrolled room conditions and produces nozzle foaming, bubble entrapment, and irregular support wall thickness. On a production extrusion line using a co-rotating twin-screw extruder with 40:1 L/D for PVA compounding, batch-to-batch moisture variation is sufficient to shift filament diameter from 2.85 mm to 2.75–2.95 mm and alter support interface thickness by ±10%. The printed PLA/PVA assembly is submerged in a circulated water bath at 30–40°C; a support wall thickness of 2 mm typically clears in 1–4 h, while enclosed internal channels with tortuous paths can require 12 h or longer. Terminal products include PLA snap-fit diagnostic housings, jigs with internal cooling channels, and pre-surgical anatomical models where mechanical support removal would introduce surface defects. Compliance for electrical prototype housings references RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU Annex II, while the base PVA resin may be covered for food-contact use under FDA 21 CFR 177.1670; printed PVA support is not automatically a food-contact article due to FDM surface porosity and residual interfacial contamination unless a validated post-process sealing step is applied. Melt-flow characterization of the dried feedstock follows ISO 1133-1:2022, and mechanical testing of the finished PLA component follows ASTM D638-14. ISO/ASTM 52900:2021 defines the multi-material extrusion process, but the soluble support workflow itself is governed by machine-specific removal validation rather than a single process standard.

    Build substratePVA interface settingSupport volume ratioBath temperatureTypical removal time for 2 mm support wall
    PLA100% solid interface, 0.1–0.2 mm offset15–25% sparse infill30–40°C circulated water1–4 h
    ABS/ASA100% solid interface, 2–3 interface layers15–25% sparse infill45–55°C circulated water2–6 h
    PETG100% solid interface, 0.1 mm vertical offsetbelow 1:4 PVA-to-PETG volume35–45°C circulated water2–5 h
    TPU 85A–95A100% solid interface10–20% sparse infill30–40°C gentle circulation3–8 h
    Epoxy composite core60–80% dense core, 2–3 mm shell60–80% infill60–70°C forced circulation or ultrasonic6–24 h

    Why Does PVA Support Adhesion Fail on Polycarbonate and ASA Build Chambers?

    When PVA supports are paired with ABS, ASA, or polycarbonate build materials in enclosed heated chambers, the support material operates outside its low-heat-deflection envelope. Commercial PVA support filaments commonly exhibit Vicat softening in the 55–60°C range, while ABS and ASA build plates are held at 95–110°C and chamber air temperatures can exceed 60°C in passively heated enclosures. Under these conditions, PVA support pillars and interface layers lose compressive stiffness, leading to lateral sag, interface delamination, and transfer of surface defects to the underside of overhangs. The process conflict is managed by restricting PVA use to the support interface only, with a solid interface density of 100% and 2–3 interface layers, while printing the bulk support body in the primary build polymer at 15–25% infill. This ratio reduces PVA volume by as much as 70–80% compared with full-PVA supports. Adhesion to ABS and ASA is lower than to PLA because the nonpolar styrenic surface presents a lower solubility parameter match; a horizontal offset of 0.05–0.10 mm is sometimes used to interlock the interface, but excessive offset produces weak support contact and edge curl. Production-side experience on dual-extruder workcells with active chamber heaters shows that the PVA-loaded tool head must be idled below 120°C during single-head ABS operation to prevent thermal darkening and carbonized residue in the nozzle. Terminal components in this segment include ASA automotive light-housing mock-ups, ABS instrument panel clips, and polycarbonate electrical enclosure covers where the final part surface must remain free of breakaway scars. Compliance for vehicle interior prototypes may reference REACH Regulation 1907/2006 Annex XVII for restricted substances, and electrical enclosures fall under RoHS 2011/65/EU. Dimensional acceptance of the support interface is verified with contact profilometry rather than a specific ISO standard; published data for Clariant-grade PVA adhesion to polycarbonate is limited and must be validated on the target printer geometry.

    For PETG transparent medical housing prototypes, PVA support removal avoids the stress-whitening and scoring produced by mechanical breakaway supports on polished or optically inspected surfaces. PETG is printed at 235–245°C with a bed temperature of 70–80°C, which can soften PVA at the interface; however, if the PVA support is deposited as a dense 100% interface with 0.1 mm vertical offset and the PVA tool head is cooled below 45°C during non-extrusion, the soluble layer remains dimensionally stable for short runs. The PVA-to-PETG volume ratio is maintained below 1:4 to prevent long dissolution cycles and excessive bath contamination. A warm water bath at 35–45°C with gentle circulation clears 2 mm PVA support walls in approximately 2–5 h; ultrasonic agitation at 40 kHz shortens removal time for thin cavities but may induce micro-bubbles in uncured PETG if the part is left in the bath too long. Terminal products include transparent pharmaceutical handling fixtures, medical demonstration housings, and laboratory safety-shield brackets where internal light transmission must be verified without support residue. Raw material biocompatibility may be evaluated under ISO 10993-5:2009 for cytotoxicity if the final device contacts tissue, but the PVA support itself is not present in the final article; residual PVA film on PETG surfaces is removed by rinsing with deionized water until the rinse water shows no turbidity change. Published data for optical clarity after PVA dissolution on PETG is limited; validation should include an optical haze measurement or spectrophotometric transmission scan to confirm residual surface contamination below the product specification.

    Sacrificial Core Mandrels in Hollow Composite Duct Layup

    Thermoplastic PVA filament is processed into printed core mandrels for hollow carbon-fibre or glass-fibre epoxy ducts when the geometry cannot be produced on an extractable metal mandrel. The PVA core is printed with a shell thickness of 2–3 mm and infill density of 60–80% to resist vacuum-bag pressure up to 0.9 bar without shell buckling. Before layup, the core surface is sealed with a 5–10 wt% aqueous PVA solution to close layer seams and prevent wet resin from infiltrating the porous printed core. The epoxy system must remain below 60–70°C during cure because the core loses compressive strength as it approaches the Vicat softening point; high-temperature autoclave cycles above 100°C are not compatible with unremoved PVA mandrels. After cure, the assembly is immersed in heated water at 60–70°C with forced circulation or ultrasonic agitation; dissolution of a 50 mm-diameter, 300 mm-long core can take 6–24 h depending on infill density and exposed end surface area. Core removal leaves a void with internal surface roughness corresponding to the FDM layer pattern, which may be accepted for duct flow or smoothed with a subsequent coating. Terminal components include drone arm mandrels, air-intake ducts, and hollow mould tooling cavities for low-pressure composite production. Composite mechanical verification follows ASTM D3039/D3039M-17 on a cured laminate sample, while residual PVA washout is monitored by measuring total organic carbon in the rinse water until the reading returns to baseline. Published data for this specific Clariant PVA grade in composite core washout is limited, and production-scale removal time must be validated for each core geometry.

    When Internal Microchannels Are Printed with PVA as a Removable Mandrel

    In lab-on-chip prototype fabrication, PVA filament is used as a printed internal channel mandrel that is washed out after the surrounding polymer body is completed. The PVA channel core is printed at 100% infill with a line width of 0.4 mm and layer height of 0.1–0.15 mm to create the smoothest available channel surface. The minimum channel diameter is constrained by the need to maintain water ingress and to avoid fully blocked dissolution paths; channels below 1 mm diameter commonly show incomplete PVA removal unless the length-to-diameter ratio is kept below 20:1 and both ends are accessible for flushing. A heated bath at 40°C with 40 kHz ultrasonic agitation improves transport of dissolved PVA out of narrow channels, but pressure flushing with a syringe pump or peristaltic pump through a luer fitting is required for channels longer than 50 mm. Dissolution time for a 1 mm channel of 100 mm length can exceed 12–24 h, and residual PVA is detected by a colorimetric iodine-boric acid method before the microfluidic device is sealed. Terminal products include microfluidic validation chips, fluidic manifolds, and sacrificial internal cooling channels in laboratory diagnostic cartridges. If the finished microfluidic device is intended for biological sample processing, raw material assessment may follow ISO 10993-5:2009 for cytotoxicity, but the PVA mandrel is not a final device component. Published data for Clariant PVA in sub-millimeter channels is limited; manufacturers should validate channel clearing with a tracer dye and pressure-drop measurement before committing to production runs.

    Application scenarioRelevant standard or regulationApplication-specific test or clause
    PLA/PVA soluble support for electrical prototypesRoHS 2011/65/EUAnnex II restricted substances for electrical and electronic equipment
    PVA base resin food-contact statusFDA 21 CFR 177.1670Polyvinyl alcohol polymer for aqueous food contact; printed article not automatically compliant
    PVA water absorption and drying controlASTM D570-98(2021)Water absorption of plastics; pre-drying threshold below 0.5 wt%
    Finished plastic prototype tensile testingASTM D638-14Type I specimen tensile properties of plastics
    Melt flow rate of PVA feedstockISO 1133-1:2022Melt mass-flow rate measurement for extrusion control
    Medical or skin-contact devices containing final printed partsISO 10993-5:2009; ISO 10993-10:2021In vitro cytotoxicity; skin sensitization and irritation
    Composite laminate mechanical verification after core removalASTM D3039/D3039M-17Tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials

    For TPU wearable interface prototypes at Shore hardness values from 85A to 95A, PVA support removal prevents the tearing, delamination, and surface gouging that mechanical breakaway supports produce on flexible overhangs. TPU is printed at 220–240°C with a bed temperature of 40–60°C, and the PVA support is configured with a 100% dense interface over a sparse support body of 10–20% infill. The support volume ratio is kept low because TPU absorbs water during long dissolution exposure; bath temperature is held at 30–40°C, and the TPU part is removed from the water as soon as support dissolution is visually complete to avoid dimensional swelling. Support walls of 2 mm typically clear in 3–8 h under gentle water circulation; ultrasonic agitation is not recommended for soft TPU grades because it can accelerate water uptake and surface blistering. Terminal products include custom orthotic pads, wearable sensor housings, and flexible cable strain-relief boots where PVA supports allow internal channels and undercuts without post-removal abrasion. Compliance for skin-contacting final devices may require ISO 10993-10:2021 sensitization testing on the TPU article, and residual PVA film on the TPU surface must be rinsed with deionized water until no turbidity change is observed. Published data for Clariant PVA as a support on TPU is limited; adhesion and dissolution behavior must be validated for the specific Shore hardness and part geometry before production-scale use.

    Бесплатная цитата

    Конкурентные цены на термопластичные поливиниловые спиртные 3D-принтеры Clariant, которые соответствуют вашему бюджету - гибкие условия и индивидуальные котировки для каждого заказа.

    Для получения образцов, цен или более подробной информации свяжитесь с нами по адресу +8618136850665 или отправить по почте admin@ascent-chem.com.

    Мы ответим вам как можно скорее.

    Телефон: +8618136850665

    Электронная почта: admin@ascent-chem.com

    Запрос

    Получите бесплатную сметуAscent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited

    Гибкие условия оплаты, конкурентоспособные цены, первоклассное обслуживание — обращайтесь прямо сейчас!

    Сертификация и соответствие требованиям
    Более подробное введение

    Clariant Thermoplastic Polyvinyl Alcohol 3D Printer Filament is produced as a water-removable support feedstock for fused filament fabrication cells operating with dual-extrusion or independent toolchanger architecture. The product is supplied in nominal 1.75 mm and 2.85 mm filament diameters; lot-specific datasheets should be consulted for ovality, spool mass, moisture content, and melt-flow data before production use. Unlike solvent-removable styrenic support materials, this PVOH grade is removed in water. Unlike breakaway support filaments, it does not depend on mechanical fracture at the support interface. The material is used for soluble columns, dense support ceilings, and support regions inside enclosed cavities where physical removal cannot access internal channels. Because the feedstock is hygroscopically active, spool-level moisture control is a primary process variable rather than a secondary handling concern. Supplier-reported tensile and melt-flow values are meaningful only when specimens are conditioned and tested in accordance with ISO 527-2 and ISO 1133-1:2022; published data for this specific Clariant configuration is limited, and incoming lot qualification should include direct measurement of diameter, ovality, and post-drying mass loss.

    Predrying Requirements at Elevated Relative Humidity and Spool Handling Limits

    At ambient relative humidity above 60%, pre-drying is mandatory before extrusion. Moisture uptake in PVOH support filament produces steam bubble defects, intermittent nozzle drool, reduced interlayer fusion, and filament swelling that can alter feed-wheel grip. Desiccant drying at 55 °C to 65 °C for 4 h to 8 h with a drying-air dew point of -30 °C or lower is a practical boundary for production lots. Vacuum drying at 40 °C to 50 °C is an alternative where oxidative exposure must be minimized. A spool exposed to uncontrolled atmosphere at RH 60% or greater for longer than 2 h may require reconditioning because PVOH equilibrates rapidly with ambient moisture. In extrusion operations using closed-loop dehumidifying hopper dryers, the same dew-point discipline applies: a dew point of ≤ -30 °C and residence time of 4 h or longer should be treated as the minimum configuration. Storing opened spools in sealed containers with calcium chloride or molecular sieve desiccant is not a substitute for active drying, but it reduces the rate of moisture ingress. Batch-to-batch variance is observed on production-scale extrusion lines because the degree of hydrolysis, plasticizer content, and molecular weight distribution alter the moisture absorption isotherm; these parameters should be recorded from certificate-of-analysis data for each incoming lot.

    Melt processing is constrained by a narrow thermal window. The nozzle setpoint for Clariant thermoplastic PVOH support stock is typically held between 190 °C and 210 °C, with build plate settings between 45 °C and 60 °C. Above 220 °C, PVOH begins accumulating thermal damage, evidenced by yellowing, acetic-acid odor, and deposit formation on nozzle wall surfaces. Below 185 °C, layer fusion becomes inconsistent and support-wall delamination may appear on high-aspect-ratio structures. On direct-drive extrusion systems, feed-path confinement is required because moisture-softened PVOH can buckle above the melt zone. On Bowden systems, long unsupported guide tubes increase retraction error and should be evaluated with a filament feed force below 20 N. When changing to PVOH from a higher-temperature build material, an active purge of 80 mm to 120 mm of filament at the PVOH setpoint is used to clear thermal decomposition products from the nozzle. Nozzle diameters of 0.4 mm or larger are preferable for support paths because PVOH support flow is shear-sensitive and small-orifice toolheads increase backpressure. Support-path speeds are typically reduced relative to rigid build-material speeds to control stringing and maintain a stable melt bead. The melt mass-flow rate of PVOH support grades is commonly determined by ISO 1133-1:2022 at 210 °C with 2.16 kg; where the Clariant lot sheet does not report a value, internal measurement is required rather than substitution from generic PVOH data, because plasticizer and polymerization degree shift the value substantially.

    How Does the Soluble Support Interface Behave Against PLA, PETG, and ABS Build Materials?

    PVOH support adhesion relies on polar hydroxy-group interactions with ester and carbonyl functionality in the build material. On polylactic acid and poly(ethylene terephthalate) glycol, a contact-interface layer is generally sufficient with a support roof offset of 0.20 mm to 0.25 mm and support interface density of 80% to 90%. These settings are geometry-dependent and must be calibrated on the target toolpath. On acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene, adhesion is more sensitive to bed temperature and first-layer surface condition; the support material should be deposited only after the ABS build layer has cooled below the PVOH thermal-damage boundary to avoid interfacial distortion. PVOH is not suitable as a direct support for high-temperature build materials such as polycarbonate, polysulfone, or polyetherimide when those materials require nozzle temperatures above 280 °C and chamber temperatures above 80 °C, because PVOH support walls will degrade or soften before the build material is placed. For polyamide build materials, printed PVOH supports may require a reduced support interface distance because nylon surfaces can release the support prematurely at moderate bed temperatures. Empirical pull-off specimens prepared according to ISO 527-1 or a modified peel fixture are useful for lot acceptance.

    Removal is carried out in actively circulated water rather than solvent baths. In a thermostated stirred tank held at 35 °C to 50 °C, dissolution of PVOH support structures is controlled by water temperature, flow velocity, and channel cross-section. Narrow enclosed support channels benefit from ultrasonic agitation in the 40 kHz range, which mechanically disrupts the hydrated surface layer and shortens removal time; published data for this specific Clariant configuration is limited, so dissolution time should be characterized on the target part geometry. Water above 70 °C is not recommended for build materials with heat deflection temperatures near that threshold, particularly PLA, because part dimensions may relax. After dissolution, the resulting water contains polyvinyl alcohol and may increase chemical oxygen demand; discharge limits under local effluent regulations should be checked before release to sanitary drains. Mechanical scrubbing of the part surface after water exposure should be minimized because hydrated PVOH residue can be removed by additional water exchange rather than abrasive contact. A final rinse in distilled or deionized water reduces mineral film deposition on component surfaces.

    When PVOH Support Is Selected Instead of HIPS or Breakaway Feedstock

    Selection among PVOH, HIPS, and breakaway supports is governed by removal chemistry, processing temperature, and feature fragility. HIPS requires d-limonene or terpene-based solvent removal, operates at nozzle temperatures closer to 230 °C to 250 °C, and is frequently paired with ABS because both materials share styrenic shrinkage characteristics. PVOH operates at lower temperatures and is removed with water, which makes it preferable where solvent exposure is prohibited or where the build material cannot tolerate d-limonene. Breakaway supports eliminate the wet-processing step but leave witness marks and are unsuitable for enclosed cavities. PVOH is differentiated from BVOH support grades by dissolution rate and moisture sensitivity; BVOH generally hydrates more quickly in cold water but also absorbs atmospheric moisture more aggressively, requiring stricter dry-feed handling. The Clariant PVOH product is intended for water-removable support in conventional dual-extrusion cells where moderate dissolution rates and compatibility with softer build materials are the controlling criteria.

    Comparative support-material removal media and thermal boundaries
    Support materialRemoval mediumNominal nozzle windowPrimary constraint
    PVOH (Clariant thermoplastic grade)Water190 °C–210 °CHygroscopic; pre-dry above RH 60%
    HIPSd-limonene or terpene solvent230 °C–250 °CSolvent handling and recovery
    BreakawayMechanical fractureMatched to build materialNot suitable for enclosed cavities
    BVOHWater190 °C–210 °CHigher moisture sensitivity than PVOH

    The comparative process window in the table should be used only as a screening guide. Actual nozzle temperatures, chamber conditions, and path speeds require machine-specific calibration because barrel residence time, hot-end thermal uniformity, and build-surface emissivity alter the acceptable upper boundary. On production-scale dual-extruder platforms with shared toolheads, cross-contamination between PVOH and higher-temperature build materials can occur at nozzle exchange; toolhead wipe cycles and prime towers should be configured to prevent PVOH residue from entering the build-material nozzle and vice versa.

    Dimensional Tolerance, Winding Tension, and Lot Traceability for Continuous Production

    Filament diameter consistency affects feed-rate accuracy in support paths. For production use, incoming PVOH feedstock should be measured at intervals along the spool against a tolerance of ±0.05 mm for 1.75 mm material and ±0.10 mm for 2.85 mm material, unless the lot-specific datasheet specifies otherwise. Ovality greater than 0.08 mm on 1.75 mm filament can cause feed-wheel slip, under-extrusion, and unstable support-toolpath beads. Winding tension must be uniform; inconsistent winding on large spools can create tangles or cross-overs that interrupt support extrusion. Lot traceability is required because PVOH feedstock varies with polymerization conditions and plasticizer content. A production lot should be linked to spool-level records for drying profile, measured diameter, ovality, and MFR when the support material is used for critical-application builds. Without that traceability, process drift in support wall thickness or dissolution behavior cannot be reliably diagnosed. The product is intended for industrial fused filament fabrication; for food-contact or medical applications, separate compliance documentation under the applicable regulatory scheme is required and should not be inferred from generic PVOH composition.

    Conditioning and reference test designations for PVOH support feedstock
    Standard or test methodParameterRelevance to PVOH support use
    ISO 291Conditioning atmosphereReference state for property comparison; supports are moisture-sensitive
    ISO 527-2Tensile propertiesSpecimen type 1B or 5A for support-wall mechanical data
    ISO 1133-1:2022Melt mass-flow rateMFR at 210 °C/2.16 kg for lot consistency
    ISO 62:2008Water absorptionMoisture uptake and hydration behavior after immersion
    ISO 1183-1:2019DensityGradient column or gas pycnometer for void estimation
    ISO 306:2022Vicat softening temperatureThermal boundary before support deformation
    ISO 75-2:2013Deflection temperature under loadUpper build plate or oven boundary

    Where datasheet values are absent, the relevant test method should be performed on conditioned specimens from the same spool batch used for the build. PVOH support feedstock does not behave as a rigid engineering filament after moisture exposure; therefore, mechanical values obtained without controlled conditioning are not reliable for equipment parameter decisions. On manufacturing lines with high ambient humidity, it is not sufficient to rely on supplier-provided moisture content at packaging. The spool should be weighed before and after drying, and the mass loss should be tracked against a defined upper limit. If mass loss exceeds 2.5% relative to spool weight after 4 h of drying, the material should be evaluated for hydrolysis damage and may require rejection or extended drying at the low end of the temperature range. This threshold is operational guidance rather than a replacement for supplier specification limits, because plasticized PVOH grades can exhibit different water-content baselines. The filament should not be processed in open-air spool holders at elevated relative humidity for extended build runs without a sealed feed enclosure or dry-air purge.

    ТОП