| Код ТН ВЭД | 657236 |
Как аккредитованный завод Markforged Fiberglass 3D Printed Composite, мы соблюдаем строгие протоколы качества - каждая партия подвергается строгим испытаниям для обеспечения последовательных стандартов эффективности и безопасности.
| Упаковка | |
| Доставка | |
| Хранение |
In high-mix CNC machining cells where aluminium soft jaws are replaced by polymer-composite workholding, Markforged Fiberglass 3D Printed Composite enters the fixture inventory through a substitution logic that prioritizes damping and weight reduction over ultimate stiffness. The formulation addition ratio is not a melt-compounded weight fraction, because the reinforcement is introduced as a continuous fiberglass strand fused between layers of Onyx nylon matrix rather than dispersed as chopped fiber. For a workholding fixture subjected to 3 kN to 8 kN vise clamping force, the build is typically started with 4 continuous fiber layers per 1.0 mm unreinforced shell thickness and 2 concentric fiber rings around reamed bores. This layer-stack corresponds to a fiber volume fraction that Markforged does not publish as a single batch-independent value; cross-section validation is therefore performed by optical microscopy or acid digestion under ASTM D3171 if the engineering release requires a quantitative fiber fraction. The downstream production process begins with fused filament fabrication of Onyx shells and continuous fiber placement on a Markforged X7 or Mark Two cell, followed by carbide reaming of locating bores and pocket floor facing. The terminal products include tombstone jaw inserts, CMM alignment pallets, bore-check gages, and vacuum fixture bases. The governing compliance framework is ISO 9001:2015 for first article control and IATF 16949 where the fixture supports automotive part traceability; mechanical qualification uses ASTM D638 Type I specimens printed in the same plane and at the same layer height as the production fixture. The primary operational boundary is nylon-matrix creep under continuous clamp load at elevated shop temperatures. Published creep-rupture data for this exact continuous fiberglass lay-up is limited; therefore, release testing commonly specifies a 72-hour dimensional stability hold at 40°C and 80% RH, with allowable bore-to-bore drift not exceeding 0.05 mm. Machining operators have observed that uncoated carbide end mills at 12,000 rpm produce acceptable pocket finish for first article lots, but edge rounding from glass fiber abrasion becomes measurable after 50 fixture units, at which point diamond-coated tooling is required to hold ±0.02 mm true position on reamed holes.
Substituting 6061-T6 aluminium with Markforged Fiberglass 3D Printed Composite in robotic end-of-arm tooling changes the design constraint from static yield strength to dynamic deflection under acceleration. The industry compliance standard for this application is ISO 12100:2010 risk assessment, with robot-specific guarding and tool mounting evaluated under ISO 10218-2:2011 and ANSI/RIA R15.06-2012. The formulation addition ratio is specified as the number of continuous fiberglass layers per Onyx shell thickness and the number of fiber rings around threaded-insert pockets. For a palletizing gripper arm moving at 0.5 m/s end-effector velocity and handling 2.5 kg payloads, a qualification build usually starts with 6 continuous fiber layers per 1.2 mm shell wall and 3 fiber rings around each M6 threaded insert bore. The downstream production process involves CFF printing with Onyx as the matrix, heat-stake installation of brass or stainless steel threaded inserts at 160°C to 180°C, and breakout verification on a calibrated torque wrench to 5 N·m. Terminal products include vacuum cup mounting frames, palletizing fingers, bin-picking guard shells, and EOAT quick-change adapter plates. The critical process conflict in this scenario is that excessive continuous fiber concentration near insert bores raises local stiffness but reduces insert pull-out strength due to interlaminar shear stress; therefore, the fiber lay-up must be interrupted 1.5 mm from insert walls to permit matrix plastic deformation. Published data for this precise insert-fiber interaction is limited, so first-article validation should follow ASTM D5961 for bearing strength and ASTM D5766 for open-hole tensile behavior of the laminate. Operational boundary: continuous exposure above 60°C in automotive body-shop paint-curing zones is not recommended because nylon matrix softening reduces screw retention.
Electrostatic discharge control in SMT board-handling has moved from machined acetal to printed composite carriers when the part geometry includes deep pockets or unsupported spans beyond the machinable envelope of static-dissipative stock. In this scenario, the formulation addition ratio is defined as continuous fiberglass layer count within the carrier floor and side rails; because continuous fiberglass is electrically non-conductive, the ESD performance is not assumed from Onyx matrix datasheet values. The applicable compliance standard is IEC 61340-5-1 for ESD protected areas, with surface resistance measured under IEC 61340-2-3 and material compliance under RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU. A printed board carrier for a 300 mm × 300 mm panel typically uses 3 continuous fiber layers per 1.5 mm floor thickness and 2 fiber rings around locating pin bores. The downstream production process includes CFF deposition on a Markforged X7, CNC routing of panel pockets, installation of hardened steel locating pins, and application of a static-dissipative coating if measured surface resistance exceeds 1×10⁹ Ω. Terminal products include selective soldering fixture plates, AOI camera calibration frames, stencil cleaner support nests, and board handling trays for odd-form assemblies. The main process threshold is warpage anisotropy during repeated oven exposure. A higher fiber fraction increases in-plane modulus but magnifies residual stress when the carrier passes through 120°C thermal cycles; planarity should be checked after 100 cycles according to IPC-TM-650 2.4.22 for bow and twist. Published data for this specific continuous fiberglass component is limited; lot-by-lot validation is therefore required.
Under AS9100D, traceable material substitution in aerospace assembly aids requires comparison of a printed composite fixture to incumbent tooling on controlled first-article inspection rather than material category equivalence. The formulation addition ratio for Markforged Fiberglass 3D Printed Composite is specified as a fiber layer stack in the drilling and trim fixture sections; for a low-rate wing rib drilling template with 3 mm bushing plate, the build typically uses 5 continuous fiber layers per 1.0 mm plate thickness and 2 concentric fiber rings around each drill bushing bore. The industry compliance standard is AS9102 first article inspection, with mechanical test data generated under ASTM D638 and ASTM D790; the printed fixture must also meet the customer’s REACH and RoHS substance declarations for manufacturing aids. The downstream production process begins with CFF printing on Markforged FX20 or X7 equipment in a controlled ambient, followed by CNC drilling and reaming of bushing holes, installation of press-fit hardened drill bushings, and coordinate measuring machine verification against CAD. Terminal products include wing rib drill templates, fuselage layup trim fixtures, harness routing guides, and composite repair mirror plates. The principal limitation is that these parts are assembly aids, not certified flight hardware; they are not substitutes for aluminium drill templates where prime-level part marking and serialization require metallic traceability. Process conflict arises from the mismatch between the thermal expansion of the nylon matrix and the hardened steel drill bushing. At shop temperatures above 55°C, bore-to-bore spacing can drift by more than 0.03 mm over a 400 mm span; qualification should include thermal cycling to 55°C for 24 hours before CMM sign-off. Published CTE data for this specific continuous fiber lay-up is not stated in the manufacturer’s public datasheet; therefore, a first-article drift study is mandatory.
For hydraulic manifold assembly, continuous fiberglass composite workholding provides higher vibration damping than aluminium but imposes a flexural modulus penalty that must be managed through ribbing and fiber placement. The formulation addition ratio in this scenario is controlled by the ratio of continuous fiberglass rings placed around manifold tube ports and the thickness of the base plate. A hydraulic manifold assembly jig designed for 20 N·m to 60 N·m torque-on-flange operation commonly uses 4 continuous fiber layers per 0.8 mm base-plate thickness and 2 fiber rings around each port boss. Industry compliance standards include ISO 4413:2010 for hydraulic system safety and ASTM D790 for flexural modulus verification; where the fixture is used inside an ISO 9001:2015 factory, the validation record follows in-process inspection requirements. The downstream production process includes CFF/FFF printing of the base and port bosses, heat insertion of thread repair inserts in manifold mounting points, and CNC skimming of the manifold seating face to achieve 0.02 mm flatness. Terminal products include hydraulic manifold assembly jigs, cartridge valve setting plates, flange alignment templates, and torque sequencing aids. The process conflict is that continuous fiberglass improves damping but the low strain-to-failure of the composite at threaded insert locations can crack under impact loading if a technician overtorques a fastener with an unregulated air tool. Therefore, the production work instruction should limit tightening to a calibrated torque wrench and not allow impact wrench loads exceeding 10 N·m on insert-bearing holes. Published data for impact toughness of this exact continuous fiberglass laminate is limited; a screening test using ISO 179-1 Charpy unnotched specimens is often substituted.
Where continuous fiberglass composite jigs are deployed in humid, mildly acidic process environments in chemical MRO operations, water absorption limits replace pure strength limits as the selection criterion. Markforged Fiberglass 3D Printed Composite is used for pipe alignment and flange drilling aids where stainless steel plate is overweight and aluminium is corroded by chloride-bearing atmospheres. The formulation addition ratio is specified as a minimum surface fiber layer count because the Onyx nylon matrix absorbs moisture preferentially; a minimum of 6 continuous fiber layers per 1.0 mm exposed shell thickness is set on wetted surfaces to reduce thickness swelling. Industry compliance standards include ASTM D570 for water absorption and ISO 62 for moisture uptake after conditioning; material handling and marking of plant fixtures fall under ISO 9001:2015. The downstream production process begins with CFF printing of the jig body, followed by CNC machining of pipe saddle profiles and flange bolt circles, and sealing of cut edges with a low-viscosity epoxy pen to limit moisture ingress along exposed fiber-matrix interfaces. Terminal products include pipe alignment jigs, flange drilling templates, pump base plate leveling fixtures, and valve stem setting tools. Operational boundaries: continuous immersion in water above 50°C is outside the validated range because nylon matrix hydrolysis may reduce fiber-matrix adhesion; chemical compatibility should be verified for each process fluid because phenolic and strong acid streams can attack the matrix. Published data for long-term moisture regain of this specific continuous fiberglass lay-up is limited, so any installation requiring more than 30 days of intermittent wet-dry cycling must undergo dimensional stability testing under ISO 62 before release. The fiber addition ratio in this scenario must be balanced against machinability; increasing fiber layers beyond 8 per 1.0 mm may raise cutting forces during CNC saddle profiling to a level where the nylon matrix smears and requires cryogenic or chilled air assistance.
Конкурентные цены на 3D-печатные композиты из стекловолокна Markforged, которые соответствуют вашему бюджету - гибкие условия и индивидуальные котировки для каждого заказа.
Для получения образцов, цен или более подробной информации свяжитесь с нами по адресу +8618136850665 или отправить по почте admin@ascent-chem.com.
Мы ответим вам как можно скорее.
Телефон: +8618136850665
Электронная почта: admin@ascent-chem.com
Гибкие условия оплаты, конкурентоспособные цены, первоклассное обслуживание — обращайтесь прямо сейчас!
Markforged Fiberglass 3D Printed Composite is a continuous-fiber reinforcement filament for fused filament fabrication (FFF) systems equipped with a dedicated continuous-fiber toolhead. The material is embedded into a polymer matrix, typically Markforged Onyx, through a dual-extrusion sequence in which matrix layers are printed first and continuous glass roving is consolidated into selected layers. Compatible Markforged platforms include the Mark Two and X7; systems without a continuous-fiber nozzle cannot process the fiberglass spool. Supplier-published datasheet values for fiberglass-reinforced Onyx include a tensile strength of 590 MPa, a tensile modulus of 21 GPa, a flexural strength of 600 MPa, a flexural modulus of 22 GPa, a heat deflection temperature of 105 °C at 0.45 MPa per ASTM D648, and a density of approximately 1.5 g/cm³. These values are reported by the material supplier with reference to ASTM D638-14 and ASTM D790-17; because printed continuous-fiber composites are anisotropic, the values should not be treated as isotropic design allowables without orientation-specific validation.
On production equipment such as the X7, the fiberglass spool is fed through a separate fiber nozzle and cut after each reinforced layer by a rotary cutter in the print head. The build-preparation software, Eiger, controls fiber layer placement, fiber orientation, and the number of continuous fiber layers within a part. The reinforcement is therefore a unidirectional lamina rather than a dispersed filler; this distinction has direct consequences for stiffness, failure behavior, and part qualification.
The difference lies in fiber length, orientation control, and load transfer. In short-fiber reinforced thermoplastics, fibers are typically milled or chopped to lengths below 1 mm and distributed through the polymer melt. The resulting modulus increase is measurable, but the fiber aspect ratio is often below the critical length required for fully fiber-dominated tensile load transfer. In continuous fiberglass reinforcement, the glass roving remains unbroken along the full length of the printed layer, allowing tensile loads to be carried primarily by the fiber phase along its longitudinal axis. The tensile strength of fiberglass-reinforced Onyx is reported at 590 MPa, compared with approximately 40 MPa for unreinforced Onyx and 800 MPa for continuous carbon fiber-reinforced Onyx. The tensile modulus rises from 2.4 GPa for unreinforced Onyx to 21 GPa for fiberglass reinforcement and 60 GPa for carbon fiber reinforcement.
Because the continuous fiber is deposited as unidirectional roving, mechanical properties exhibit strong in-plane anisotropy. The published ASTM D638-14 values represent the fiber-dominated longitudinal response and do not capture the matrix-dominated transverse strength or interlaminar shear response. For unidirectional polymer-matrix composites, ASTM D3039/D3039M tabbed specimens and ASTM D3518/D3518M in-plane shear specimens are more representative of design-level performance. Published data for off-axis fiberglass-reinforced Onyx configurations are limited; orientation-specific allowables should be generated before relying on non-zero fiber paths in load-bearing parts.
In practice, fiberglass is selected where continuous carbon fiber stiffness is not required and where the dominant load path can be aligned with the fiber axis. The material has a lower tensile modulus than carbon fiber and is generally lower in cost per spool, but it provides substantially higher strength and stiffness than Onyx-only printing. The choice between fiberglass and carbon fiber is therefore driven by specific stiffness requirements, cost constraints, and impact or durability needs.
For process parameter selection, fiberglass-reinforced Onyx is typically printed at layer heights between 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm, depending on the selected print profile and surface-finish requirements. Continuous fiber layers are inserted only after the matrix layers are extruded, and the fiber nozzle path cannot include tight turns below the minimum radius defined by Eiger without producing tow puckering, uneven consolidation, or incomplete matrix wet-out. The material is moisture-sensitive; exposed spools should be stored in a desiccant cabinet below 20 % RH when ambient humidity exceeds 60 % RH, and spools should be returned to sealed containers after the build. Published data on moisture uptake rate for this specific fiberglass product are limited, but uncontrolled storage is associated with void formation and reduced interlaminar adhesion in nylon-matrix continuous-fiber parts.
Observed failure modes in production FFF composite equipment include fiber starvation at sharp toolpath corners, localized matrix bubbling at layer transitions, and incomplete fiber compaction when the build plate is out of level. These process defects are often sub-surface and cannot be reliably detected by visual inspection alone. Because the fiber volume fraction achieved in a printed part is influenced by layer height, matrix extrusion temperature, and toolpath density, published fiber volume fraction values for Markforged Fiberglass are limited and should not be assumed constant across different Eiger profiles.
For load-bearing or safety-critical parts, X-ray computed tomography or destructive cross-sectioning is recommended to verify fiber placement, porosity, and matrix wet-out. Mechanical test coupons should be built on the same machine and with the same Eiger settings as the production part. The build process is classified under material extrusion additive manufacturing, as defined in ISO/ASTM 52921, and the printed article is a fiber-reinforced polymer composite rather than a homogeneous thermoplastic. This classification affects test method selection: ASTM D638-14 may be used for comparative feedstock characterization, while ASTM D3039/D3039M is preferred for continuous-fiber laminate tensile response.
Because the continuous fiber is deposited as unidirectional roving, mechanical properties exhibit strong in-plane anisotropy. Designers should orient fiber layers along the primary tensile or bending load path and avoid relying on continuous fiberglass for out-of-plane or peel-dominated joints. The matrix, Markforged Onyx, governs transverse tensile, interlaminar shear, and bearing behavior. Hole-bearing surfaces and press-fit locations may therefore require additional wall layers, metal inserts, or a change to carbon fiber when local stiffness is insufficient. In assembly tooling, fiberglass-reinforced Onyx is commonly used for locating arms, soft jaws, and light-load fixtures where dimensional stability above Onyx-only parts is required but continuous carbon fiber is not necessary.
Compared with carbon fiber, fiberglass has a lower tensile modulus of 21 GPa and a higher density of approximately 1.5 g/cm³, which reduces its specific stiffness. The material is not a direct substitute for carbon fiber in lightweight aerospace brackets or drone structural components where stiffness-to-weight is critical. For impact resistance, Kevlar-reinforced Onyx is commonly selected because its tensile strain at break is higher than fiberglass and carbon fiber; however, supplier-published notched Izod or Charpy impact values are not consistently available for these continuous-fiber systems. HSHT fiberglass provides similar tensile properties to standard fiberglass with a higher reported heat deflection temperature of approximately 150 °C, making it more suitable for tooling exposed to intermittent heat. These are material-level distinctions; part-level performance remains strongly dependent on fiber orientation and matrix route.
| System | Tensile strength (MPa) | Tensile modulus (GPa) | Density (g/cm³) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onyx unreinforced | 40 | 2.4 | 1.2 |
| Fiberglass-reinforced Onyx | 590 | 21 | 1.5 |
| Carbon fiber-reinforced Onyx | 800 | 60 | 1.4 |
Values are supplier-published and reference ASTM D638-14-type tensile specimens; they are fiber-direction dominated and may not represent transverse or interlaminar performance.
Part-level substitution requires redesign of load paths, fastening details, and tolerancing. The density of fiberglass-reinforced Onyx is approximately 1.5 g/cm³, compared with approximately 2.7 g/cm³ for 6061-T6 aluminum, which can reduce tool weight but does not automatically preserve stiffness or flatness. The tensile strength of 590 MPa along the fiber axis exceeds the yield strength of some aluminum alloys in simple tension, but the printed part is anisotropic, notch-sensitive at layer interfaces, and dependent on fiber placement. Aluminum provides uniform in-plane stiffness and bearing strength; fiberglass-reinforced Onyx requires deliberate placement of fiber layers around bolt holes and load-introduction points.
For locating features that experience repeated sliding contact, hardened inserts or bushings should be installed because the matrix-rich surfaces have lower abrasion resistance than aluminum or steel. If the printing process introduces moisture or poor fiber consolidation, interlaminar voids can reduce compressive and bearing performance. Part-level dimensional change under load should be measured rather than inferred solely from published tensile values. Published creep and relaxation data for this specific printed composite are limited; long-duration static loads below the reported heat deflection temperature may still produce time-dependent deformation in the nylon matrix.
Fiberglass-reinforced Onyx is not an isotropic metal replacement. Its transverse tensile strength, interlaminar shear strength, and bearing strength are governed by the Onyx matrix and the fiber-matrix interface; published data for these specific arrangements are limited. Continuous service above 105 °C is not recommended because the matrix may lose stiffness as the temperature approaches the reported heat deflection temperature. Avoid prolonged contact with strong acids, phenols, and oxidizing fluids unless compatibility is verified by ASTM D543 immersion testing. The material should not be autoclaved or subjected to hot-steam sterilization because the nylon matrix and fiber-matrix interface can degrade. In applications requiring high-impact energy absorption, Kevlar-reinforced Onyx may be more appropriate than fiberglass, although published comparative impact data are limited. In applications requiring maximum specific stiffness, continuous carbon fiber-reinforced Onyx is generally preferred over fiberglass.