| Код ТН ВЭД | 556623 |
Как аккредитованный завод Mitsubishi FGF CARBON-P PET-G, наполненный 15% углеродным волоконом 3D-полимером для печати, мы соблюдаем строгие протоколы качества - каждая партия подвергается строгим испытаниям для обеспечения последовательных стандартов эффективности и безопасности.
| Упаковка | |
| Доставка | |
| Хранение |
On a gantry-based fused granular fabrication cell fitted with a heated build chamber at 70 °C and a single-screw extruder with a hardened barrel and screw, Mitsubishi FGF CARBON-P PET-G is deposited at bead widths from 1.0 mm to 5.0 mm onto a glass-fiber-reinforced polymer build sheet for vacuum forming and pressure forming tooling. The carbon fiber loading modifies tool substrate response under clamping and plug-assist loads: dimensional movement is lower than unfilled PET-G when measured by ASTM E831-19, although the exact coefficient of thermal expansion for this specific filled grade must be taken from lot-level data rather than transferred from filament-grade carbon PET-G publications. Pre-drying in a desiccant dryer at 65 °C for 4 h to 6 h at a dew point no higher than -40 °C is required before processing; residual moisture below 0.03 % by Karl Fischer titration is a typical PET-G processing criterion, and pellets exposed to ambient air above 60 % RH for more than 30 min should be re-dried because hydrolytic degradation of the PET-G ester linkages produces splay and loss of interlayer fusion. The printed near-net blank is machined with carbide or polycrystalline diamond tooling and sealed with a two-part epoxy or polyurethane coating to close inter-bead porosity before vacuum drilling. Bead widths below 1.0 mm increase shear heating and fiber attrition, while bead widths above 5.0 mm can trap voids at undercut transitions. Toolpath strategy uses contour-first perimeters with alternating 45° raster fill to reduce curl at the tool perimeter. Post-print annealing at 65 °C for 2 h in a convection oven can reduce residual stress in thick beads, but the part must be supported because the PET-G matrix softens near its glass transition. Operational boundary: continuous tool surface temperature must remain below 60 °C; autoclave or oven cure above 65 °C causes creep and loss of pattern accuracy. Cleaning with concentrated amines or strong alkaline degreasers is incompatible with the PET-G matrix and should be avoided.
Low part mass and moderate flexural stiffness are primary design requirements for robotic end-of-arm components operating on six-axis arms with payload classes from 7 kg to 25 kg. A single-piece gripper frame printed from Mitsubishi FGF CARBON-P PET-G at a wall count of 5 to 7 perimeters consolidates vacuum channel routing, locating dowels, and bolted interface pads into one structure, eliminating multiple aluminium plate and linear shaft components. The filled polymer exhibits a density range of 1.30 g/cm³ to 1.40 g/cm³ under ISO 1183-1:2019, relative to 2.70 g/cm³ for 6061-T6 aluminium, but flexural modulus measured by ISO 178:2019 is not equivalent to aluminium; carbon-fiber-filled PET-G grades with preserved fiber length typically fall between 3 500 MPa and 5 500 MPa, so section depth must increase where metal-equivalent stiffness is required. The extruder screw and barrel should be hardened or coated because the carbon fiber phase accelerates metal wear; screw speed and throughput are normally run at 60 % to 80 % of unfilled PET-G settings to limit melt-pressure spikes and fiber length reduction. Machining and assembly require brass heat-set threaded inserts; hole undersizing due to fiber-filled melt elasticity can be controlled by using 0.2 mm to 0.5 mm larger pilot bores after measuring the thermal insertion bore collapse on the specific FGF cell. The limiting mechanical property is interlayer tensile strength: Z-orientation ultimate tensile strength for FGF-processed carbon PET-G has been observed at 40 % to 60 % of XY ultimate tensile strength when assessed by ISO 527-2:2012 Type 1B specimens, requiring compressive fastening paths and avoiding direct out-of-plane pull at gripper jaws. Surface resistivity must be characterised by ASTM D257-14 before use around unshielded electronics because carbon fiber orientation creates non-uniform dissipative paths along the print direction, and grounding continuity cannot be assumed from bulk resistivity alone.
The following characterisation envelope is collected from publicly reported 15 wt% carbon-fiber-filled PET-G FGF materials and is provided for preliminary design comparison only; lot-level values for Mitsubishi FGF CARBON-P PET-G must be taken from the supplier technical datasheet.
| Property | Preliminary range | Test standard |
|---|---|---|
| Density | 1.28–1.40 g/cm³ | ISO 1183-1:2019 |
| Tensile modulus | 3 800–6 000 MPa | ISO 527-2:2012 |
| Flexural modulus | 3 500–5 500 MPa | ISO 178:2019 |
| HDT at 0.455 MPa | 70–85 °C | ASTM D648-18 |
| Water absorption, 24 h immersion | 0.10–0.50 % | ASTM D570-98 |
Foundry pattern shops using sand casting and no-bake core processing can use FGF-printed carbon-filled PET-G for split patterns, core boxes, and match plates when machining stock is added at 2 mm to 4 mm per surface and finishing is carried out with carbide or diamond-coated tooling under local exhaust ventilation because carbon fiber machining dust is conductive and abrasive. Moisture absorption is lower than wood and unfilled PET-G; 24 h water immersion by ASTM D570-98 generally remains below 0.50 %, which reduces hygroscopic dimensional movement in shops without full humidity control. Surface hardness measured by ISO 868:2003 is higher than unfilled PET-G, but the carbon fiber phase is abrasive to sand and core binders; high-wear edges should be fitted with replaceable steel wear strips rather than relying on the polymer surface alone. The main process conflict is chemical: cold-box sand binders contain tertiary amines such as dimethylethylamine and triethylamine, and concentrated amine exposure can cause environmental stress cracking in PET-G; compatibility tests with production binder formulations are required before pattern shop deployment. Heat exposure must remain below 60 °C because hot-box pattern surfaces that retain sand core heat above this threshold soften the amorphous matrix and create dimensional drift. Dimensional control should follow ISO 8062:2013 for casting tolerances, with the printed tooling itself inspected after machining at 20 °C to 23 °C on a coordinate measuring machine to separate thermal growth from machining error.
Short-run automotive prototype programs require bracket geometries that are machined, inspected, and fitted within 48 h, eliminating the lead time for injection moulded ABS or glass-filled PP tools. Pellet-fed FGF cells loaded with carbon-filled PET-G produce cabin and chassis-adjacent brackets at wall thicknesses from 3 mm to 8 mm, with integrated clip bosses and threaded brass or steel inserts. The printed material must not be used for continuous service above 60 °C or short-term exposure above 75 °C; solar-soaked interior surfaces can approach this threshold, so parts should be located away from windshield and rear package tray dead zones unless the specific HDT is verified by ASTM D648-18. Fiber orientation along the bead path means tensile modulus is anisotropic; finite-element material cards should use orthotropic properties derived from XY and Z specimens rather than a single datasheet modulus. Surface finishing requires sanding from 180 to 320 grit before primer because the carbon fiber raises surface roughness and interrupts paint film adhesion; low-bake primers below 60 °C are preferred. Insert pull-out validation should be conducted with the actual fastener torque sequence, and the interlayer shear plane must not be loaded in tension; clamped joints should orient the bolt axis along the printed Z direction only when a through-bolt and metal backing washer are used. Vibration resistance and creep under clamp load can be monitored by ISO 527-2:2012 tensile creep tests at the expected cabin temperature, but published data for this specific configuration is limited and should be supplemented with prototype-level validation.
Single-piece machine guarding panels produced by FGF from carbon-filled PET-G can replace segmented polycarbonate or sheet-metal assemblies where the panel span exceeds what unfilled PET-G can hold flat within a 5 mm flatness tolerance per metre, as verified on a granite-bed coordinate measuring machine. The carbon fiber raises flexural modulus and reduces creep, but the Charpy unnotched impact energy measured by ISO 179-1/1eU is lower than unfilled PET-G, meaning that high-speed chip impact from machining centres must be validated with production tooling geometry and not inferred from slow flexural data. Flammability classification of this grade is not automatically equivalent to a V-0 or 5VA enclosure material; unfilled PET-G typically carries UL 94 HB, and carbon-filled variants must be tested before use as electrical guard panels. Cutting fluid and light mineral oil resistance is acceptable for limit-switch enclosures and splash shields, while chlorinated solvents, esters, and ketones cause stress cracking in the PET-G matrix. FGF inter-bead porosity must be sealed with a solvent-borne two-part polyurethane topcoat if the guard is exposed to flood coolant, because capillary wicking into the carbon-filled beads can carry oil into unsealed pockets. Grounding and surface-resistance measurements should follow IEC 60093 and ASTM D257-14 before installation around live busbar; carbon fiber can create conductive paths along the print direction even when the surface appears polymer-rich. Impact loading should be assessed under ANSI B11.19-2019 safeguarding performance criteria when the guard is located within the designated danger zone. EU RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU and REACH Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 declarations should be requested from the supplier for electrical/electronic guard applications because carbon-filled PET-G is not automatically exempt from restricted substance limits.
When qualifying FGF-printed carbon-filled PET-G components against industrial or electrical safety requirements, the following verification matrix should replace generic datasheet comparisons.
| Verification area | Test method | Specimen or measurement condition |
|---|---|---|
| Tensile anisotropy | ISO 527-2:2012 Type 1B | XY and Z orientations from FGF blanks |
| Flexural modulus | ISO 178:2019 | Three-point bending, span-to-thickness ratio 16:1 |
| HDT under load | ASTM D648-18 | 0.455 MPa fiber stress |
| Moisture uptake | ASTM D570-98 | 24 h immersion at 23 °C |
| Surface resistivity | ASTM D257-14 / IEC 60093 | 50 % RH, 23 °C |
| Flammability | UL 94 | Vertical or horizontal bar, as applicable |
Non-certified UAV prototype frames, arm tubes, sensor mounts, and launch fixtures printed from carbon-filled PET-G are processed with wall thicknesses from 2 mm to 4 mm and print direction aligned along the primary bending span. The bending modulus in the XY plane is higher than unfilled PET-G, but the interlayer tensile strength remains the critical design value; Z-direction tensile strength by ISO 527-2:2012 Type 1B specimens should be assumed no higher than 65 % of the XY value unless milled from a solid printed block and tested. Thin walls below 2 mm reduce fiber alignment consistency at the bead boundary and increase the probability of inter-bead voids under bending; a minimum safety factor of 3.0 on Z ultimate tensile strength is applied when the load path crosses layer boundaries. For rotor-induced vibration, dynamic mechanical analysis by ISO 6721-1:2019 is required to characterise the storage modulus and loss factor; carbon fiber raises modulus but can reduce damping relative to unfilled PET-G, altering resonance behaviour near motor harmonics. Extended outdoor UV exposure embrittles the PET-G matrix even with carbon black present; UV protective coatings should be qualified by ISO 4892-2:2013 accelerated weathering rather than assumed from fiber loading alone. Launch fixtures subject to sliding wear can exploit the carbon fiber phase for improved abrasion resistance, but dry sliding without replaceable inserts eventually produces fiber pull-out and rough surfaces that increase friction and dimensional variability. The material is not qualified as a primary airframe material under FAA or EASA airworthiness requirements and should not be substituted into type-certified structure without a full qualification programme.
Конкурентоспособные цены на Mitsubishi FGF CARBON-P PET-G, полимер для 3D-печати с наполнением углеродного волокна на 15%, которые соответствуют вашему бюджету - гибкие условия и индивидуальные котировки для каждого заказа.
Для получения образцов, цен или более подробной информации свяжитесь с нами по адресу +8618136850665 или отправить по почте admin@ascent-chem.com.
Мы ответим вам как можно скорее.
Телефон: +8618136850665
Электронная почта: admin@ascent-chem.com
Гибкие условия оплаты, конкурентоспособные цены, первоклассное обслуживание — обращайтесь прямо сейчас!
Designated Mitsubishi FGF CARBON-P PET-G, this material is a pelletized, carbon-fiber-reinforced copolyester feedstock for fused granulate fabrication. The matrix is a glycol-modified poly(ethylene terephthalate) resin in which 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol comonomer suppresses the crystallization behavior typical of homopolymer PET. The carbon fiber loading is nominally 15 wt%; the fiber phase is discontinuous, and the product is supplied as cut pellets for screw-driven pellet extruders, not as filament for conventional FFF hot ends.
Compared with filament-grade PET-G, the pellet format changes material handling and extrusion control. Positive feed mechanisms, hopper agitation, and melt-pressure monitoring are required because carbon-filled pellets can bridge at the feed throat and produce screw starvation. The material is intended for large-format machines with heated bed and enclosed or draft-shielded frame, but the exact build chamber temperature must be established from the printer manufacturer’s capability.
Carbon fiber does not eliminate moisture sensitivity of the PET-G matrix. The matrix absorbs moisture; at melt temperature, residual moisture hydrolyzes ester linkages, reducing molecular weight, viscosity, and interlayer fracture resistance. A moisture level not exceeding 0.02 wt% measured by ISO 15512 method A is the target. Desiccant drying at 65–75 °C for 4–6 h with a supply dew point of -40 °C or lower is typical. If ambient relative humidity exceeds 60%, pellets should not be removed from dry storage for more than 30 min before being fed to a heated hopper. Exceeding 80 °C during drying may induce pellet blocking because the glass transition temperature of PET-G is near 78–82 °C. Hydrolyzed material may not show visible smoking but will produce brittle weld lines and reduced z-axis tensile strength.
The extrusion window should be defined by melt temperature measured at the nozzle, not barrel setpoint alone. A nozzle melt range of 240–270 °C is used for the PET-G matrix. The carbon fiber increases thermal conductivity and can produce faster heat penetration; this allows lower barrel setpoints but also increases the risk of melt stagnation and thermal degradation if residence time exceeds machine capability. At temperatures above approximately 280 °C, chain scission of the copolyester and degradation of the carbon-fiber sizing become probable. Melt pressure should be recorded continuously; a rising pressure signature indicates nozzle plugging, degraded fiber bundles, or insufficient preheat.
| Parameter | Target or boundary | Basis / equipment | Failure mode if exceeded |
|---|---|---|---|
| Residual pellet moisture | ≤ 0.02 wt% | ISO 15512 method A, desiccant dryer | Hydrolysis, splay, low interlayer strength |
| Drying air temperature | 65–75 °C | Hopper dryer or vacuum dryer | Pellet blocking above approximately 80 °C |
| Drying air dew point | ≤ -40 °C | Desiccant wheel | Moisture regain during drying |
| Nozzle melt temperature | 240–270 °C | Nozzle thermocouple, FGF extruder | Degradation above approximately 280 °C; poor fusion below 240 °C |
| Build plate temperature | 60–80 °C | Aluminum bed with bonded polymer sheet | Warp, corner lift, or adhesion failure |
| Minimum nozzle orifice | ≥ 0.8 mm | Hardened steel or ceramic nozzle | Fiber jamming, melt-pressure rise |
| Screw compression ratio | 2.5:1–3.0:1 | Single-screw pellet extruder, L/D ≥ 20:1 | Screw starvation, throughput variation |
Carbon fiber is abrasive. Brass nozzles and standard nitrided barrels are not sufficient for extended runs; hardened tool steel barrel liners, bi-metallic screws, and ceramic or hardened steel nozzle tips are required. Screw speeds should be kept in the lower half of the extruder’s operating range to limit shear heating. Fiber length retention is more sensitive to screw speed than to barrel temperature, and excessive shear can shorten fiber to a mean length below 100–200 µm, reducing modulus gain. Fiber-length distribution can be assessed by resin burnout or solvent digestion followed by optical microscopy.
In printed form, the mechanical response is not isotropic. Bead orientation, layer time, and contact pressure at the nozzle determine fusion. Tensile values should therefore be reported with specimen extraction direction. Test coupons cut along the bead direction are evaluated by ASTM D638; tensile modulus in the transverse direction can be lower, and z-axis strength is typically governed by interlayer bond rather than material modulus. Published data for this specific configuration is limited; class-typical values for a 15 wt% carbon-fiber PET-G feedstock place tensile modulus in the range of 4,000–7,000 MPa, while unfilled PET-G generally falls near 1,500–2,200 MPa. This increase corresponds to a loss of ductility: unreinforced PET-G may exceed 50% elongation at break, whereas the carbon-fiber-modified material commonly falls below 10% and is not suitable for snap-fit or energy-absorbing features without redesign.
Flexural modulus measured by ASTM D790 follows a similar upward shift. Heat deflection temperature under 0.455 MPa by ASTM D648 can be raised from approximately 70 °C for unfilled PET-G to approximately 85–110 °C for the carbon-fiber grade, depending on fiber orientation and specimen thickness. Notched Izod impact measured by ASTM D256 is often lower than unfilled PET-G; the carbon-fiber phase initiates stress concentrations at fiber ends. Z-axis tensile strength is typically lower than print-plane strength by a factor that depends on bead contact and chamber temperature. A heated build chamber can improve interlayer fusion, but the carbon-fiber surface may reduce polymer diffusion across bead boundaries.
The primary difference from unfilled PET-G is not merely stiffness. The carbon fiber reduces thermal expansion and warpage; CLTE measured by ASTM D696 or ISO 11359-2 typically shifts from approximately 70–90 µm/m·°C for PET-G to below 50–60 µm/m·°C for the carbon-filled grade in the print-plane direction. Compared with glass-fiber-filled PET-G, the carbon-fiber grade offers lower density for equivalent stiffness, but the carbon fiber lowers electrical resistivity and increases the risk of galvanic corrosion if placed against unprotected aluminum in humid conditions. At 15 wt%, surface conductivity is not guaranteed; resistivity should be measured by IEC 61340-2-3 or ASTM D257 before specifying the material for static-dissipative tooling.
| Property | Test method | Unfilled PET-G reference | 15 wt% CF PET-G class | Design implication |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tensile modulus | ASTM D638 | 1,500–2,200 MPa | 4,000–7,000 MPa | Higher stiffness; bead orientation can move the result outside this band |
| Flexural modulus | ASTM D790 | 1,500–2,000 MPa | 4,000–7,000 MPa | Improved rigidity for long-span fixtures |
| Elongation at break | ASTM D638 | > 50% | < 10% | Eliminate snap-fit and living-hinge features |
| HDT at 0.455 MPa | ASTM D648 | 68–72 °C | 85–110 °C | Improved shape retention in heated enclosures |
| Density | ASTM D792 | 1.27 g/cm³ | 1.30–1.35 g/cm³ | Slight mass increase despite carbon-fiber density |
| Surface resistance | ASTM D257 / IEC 61340-2-3 | Insulative | Variable; not guaranteed ESD-safe | Measure on printed coupon before specifying for electronics |
Compared with carbon-filled polyamide 6 or 66, the PET-G matrix absorbs less moisture, reducing the pre-drying burden and improving dimensional stability in humid service. However, the service temperature is lower than semi-aromatic polyamide grades; repeated exposure above 80–100 °C can soften the matrix and relax carbon-fiber stress transfer. Compared with carbon-filled polycarbonate, the PET-G grade generally requires a lower build chamber temperature and shows lower tendency for warpage, but the attainable continuous-use temperature and solvent resistance are also lower.
Substitution is not direct. Because ductility is lower, holes should be machined instead of press-fit, and fasteners should use shoulder screws with load-spreading washers. The grade is applied to assembly jigs, drill guides, robotic grippers, locating templates, and low-mass production aids where stiffness and reduced creep are required. Creep behavior should be assessed by ASTM D2990 when the part is continuously loaded; the carbon fiber reduces creep strain but does not eliminate time-dependent deformation.
Bead width and layer time influence void content. For structural load, bead-fusion quality should be assessed by sectioning and micrography or by tensile testing of z-axis coupons. The carbon-fiber grade can be machined after printing; carbide tooling is recommended because the fiber is abrasive to high-speed steel. Dust extraction is required to control airborne conductive fibers. When the part is used in contact with sensitive electronics, conductivity may be insufficient for ESD-safe claims; surface resistance must be verified by IEC 61340-2-3 on the printed surface condition used in service. If painted or bonded, surface preparation includes solvent wipe and abrasion; avoid strong alkalis and polar solvents that attack PET-G.
Lot-specific certificates should provide melt flow rate, tensile modulus, and moisture content. Compliance with EU Regulation 1907/2006 (REACH) and Directive 2011/65/EU (RoHS) is to be confirmed with the supplier for each shipment. The product should not be assumed compliant with FDA 21 CFR for food-contact applications unless a specific letter of compliance is provided. Carbon-fiber dust from cutting, sanding, or pellet handling should be controlled at the machine enclosure and electrical cabinet intakes.