| Код ТН ВЭД | 496636 |
Как аккредитованный завод по производству жестких непрозрачных прототипных полимеров Proto3000 Objet Digital Materials™ DM_8320, мы соблюдаем строгие протоколы качества - каждая партия подвергается строгим испытаниям для обеспечения последовательных стандартов эффективности и безопасности.
| Упаковка | |
| Доставка | |
| Хранение |
DM_8320 is specified for consumer electronics enclosure validation when the engineering group requires an opaque rigid analogue of a glass-filled polycarbonate or PC/ABS housing before tooling release. The grade is selected in the PolyJet job preparation software as a fixed digital-material composition; the operator cannot alter the model-resin feed ratio or introduce filler. Cartridges are stored at 15–25°C and the machine chamber is held at 18–25°C with relative humidity between 30% and 70%. Parts are built at 16 µm or 30 µm layer thickness depending on the system model and the required sidewall finish. The resulting prototypes are used for snap-fit beam evaluation, boss pull-out checks, and printed circuit board carrier alignment. Opaque sidewalls allow the design team to verify internal shadowing and assembly interference without the visual distraction of transparent resin. The material is not UL Yellow Card certified for final enclosure flammability; electromagnetic compatibility screening is limited to mechanical mock-ups and does not replace certified shielding tests. Dimensional acceptance follows ISO 286-1:2010 linear tolerance classes, while tensile comparisons are made against ASTM D638-14 values generated in the x-y build plane. Strength data generated from vertical-z specimens is not interchangeable with in-plane data because PolyJet photopolymers retain anisotropic layer boundaries. The dominant process conflict occurs during support removal from snap-fit recesses; alkaline immersion beyond the printer OEM-specified window etches thin rib tips and changes snap engagement force. On production-scale fabrication lines, under-cured overhangs shorter than 0.5 mm have delaminated during repeated assembly trials, producing false fit-failure conclusions. Inspection should therefore establish a minimum feature threshold and a fixed post-processing schedule. Published data for this specific grade is limited; the component team must validate any protective masking or coating strategy if the prototype is used for field beta trials under ISO 9001 design-control rules.
The material is used for pre-surgical instrument mockups only when the device is not intended for patient contact, cleaning validation, or terminal sterilisation. Typical terminal products include trial clip cartridges, snap-together reamer guides, and handle-to-shaft fit prototypes for surgeon preference studies. Build orientation is locked so that critical mating surfaces are not placed in the first 2 mm of the z-axis, where support interface roughness is highest. Support removal uses the printer OEM alkaline bath followed by an ultrasonic rinse in deionised water at 20–25°C; the rinse is continued until the effluent pH returns to neutral. No additional coating is permitted before surgeon handling because the material is not certified under ISO 10993-5:2009 for cytotoxicity or ISO 10993-10:2021 for sensitisation. Prototypes may enter the design-control file under ISO 13485:2016 as non-clinical physical models, but they cannot substitute for a certified device material. Mechanical checks on hinge pins and locking tabs must account for z-axis anisotropy; pins printed vertically fail at lower bending loads than pins printed horizontally. Dimensional measurements are recorded after conditioning for 48 h at 23°C and 50% relative humidity in accordance with ISO 291:2008. A recurring batch-to-batch failure mode is micro-cracking around metal insert pilot holes when the hole diameter falls below 1.0 mm; the stress concentration exceeds the material’s notch sensitivity in the z plane. For this reason, metal inserts are usually replaced with printed polymer bosses in mockups that undergo repeated assembly. Published data for this specific configuration is limited, so instrument mockups must be segregated from any clinical zone and labelled as non-sterile, non-biocompatible visual prototypes.
For automotive HVAC control faceplates, switch bezel prototypes, and connector shroud form checks, DM_8320 is printed at 30 µm layer thickness to balance iteration speed with sidewall quality. The fixed digital-material ratio is set by the print software; no impact modifier or heat stabiliser is compounded by the user. Because the resin is opaque, the parts are suitable for evaluating gloss, colour, and backlit symbol contrast against OEM interior lighting. The prototypes must be conditioned to moisture equilibrium by ISO 291:2008 before thermal soak testing, because residual humidity from support removal shifts the dimensional baseline. A typical validation sequence includes 80°C instrument panel soak cycles followed by ambient cooling to 23°C; the part is then measured on the same CMM fixture each time. The material has no production interior flammability certification under FMVSS 302; therefore the prototypes cannot be installed in vehicles used for public road trials. The main manufacturing conflict is thermal expansion mismatch with polycarbonate or ABS substrates; snap hooks and locating pins designed with metal-like clearances bind after cooling. Thin vent slats and finger tabs below the printer’s recommended minimum feature width are prone to edge chipping during demating from the support structure. Uncontrolled UV re-exposure after printing can cause surface yellowing and must be avoided if colour matching is part of the evaluation. On equipment builds, warpage has been traced to non-uniform support removal and to removing parts from the chamber too quickly after printing; a stabilisation period of 2–4 h at 23°C before support removal reduces edge curl. Published data for this specific configuration is limited, so the OEM should prepare an internal material boundary document under IATF 16949 if the prototypes are used to support production appearance approval.
The following matrix summarises the compliance boundary and the primary test standard for each downstream application. It is not a substitute for OEM datasheet verification.
| Application segment | Compliance boundary | Primary standard or directive | Operational limitation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer electronics enclosure prototypes | Mechanical fit and EMC screening only; no final flammability certification | ASTM D638-14, ISO 286-1:2010 | Snap-fit rib tips damage from alkaline support removal |
| Pre-surgical instrument mockups | Non-clinical visual prototypes only | ISO 13485:2016, ISO 10993-5:2009 | Not for patient contact or sterilisation |
| Automotive HVAC bezel prototypes | Pre-production appearance and fit | ISO 291:2008, IATF 16949 | No FMVSS 302 production flammability |
| Industrial metrology fixtures | Bridge fixtures for first-article inspection | ISO 10360-2:2009, ISO 899-1:2017 | Creep under clamp point loads |
| Laboratory pneumatic manifolds | Non-clinical lab equipment | ISO 20486:2019 | Solvent crazing and channel micro-porosity |
| Closure and packaging prototypes | Packaging development only | ASTM D2063-12, ISO 6789-2:2017 | No food-contact certification |
Industrial metrology fixtures and CMM holding nests are built from DM_8320 when the inspection department requires an opaque, non-marring locator that can be produced without waiting for machined aluminium. The material is jetted as a fixed digital-material blend; the user cannot change the formulation or add filler to increase hardness. Fixture bodies are honeycombed or shelled to 3–5 mm wall thickness to reduce mass and build time. The critical process variable is support removal from dovetail slots and M3/M4 threaded inserts; residual support film changes the measured workpiece datum by 0.05–0.10 mm. Therefore, CMM validation of the printed fixture itself is performed after post-processing with a touch-trigger probe under ISO 10360-2:2009. The material serves as a bridge fixture for first-article inspection, not as a production gauge. Because photopolymers can creep under constant point loads, spring-loaded clamps are verified by a 24 h deflection test under ISO 899-1:2017 before release. The dominant batch-to-batch failure mode is datum drift caused by moisture absorption after humid shop-floor exposure; storage at 30–50% relative humidity reduces dimensional movement. Production lines have reported that fixture stiffness changes after several hundred loading cycles, so CMM requalification intervals must be defined by measured deformation, not by supplier datasheet. Published data for this specific configuration is limited; each fixture lot should be re-verified at 20°C before use on safety-critical measurements.
Laboratory automation groups use DM_8320 for opaque pneumatic manifold prototypes when internal channel sealing must be assessed before committing to machined PTFE or PEEK parts. The print job locks the digital-material composition; no reactive diluent or surface sealant is added by the operator. Internal channels are designed with a minimum diameter of 1.0 mm and are flushed with the printer OEM alkaline support-removal solution followed by deionised water until the effluent pH returns to neutral. Leak screening is run at 20–30 kPa with pressure decay recorded over 10 min; the acceptance criterion is defined in the laboratory protocol, not by the material supplier. The opaque grade aids visual inspection of external wall wetting but prevents optical verification of internal cleanliness; serial sectioning or X-ray computed tomography is required. Chemical compatibility is limited to short-term contact with water, dilute detergents, and neutral buffers; solvents such as acetone or methylene chloride craze the surface and must not be used. Terminal products are non-clinical manifolds, nozzle holders, and microplate alignment tools. Compliance falls under laboratory equipment safety directives rather than medical or food-contact regulations. The main manufacturing conflict is that prolonged alkaline exposure opens micro-pores at layer interfaces, causing false leak failures; support-removal time must be controlled to the printer OEM’s specified window. Published adhesion and leak-rate data for this specific configuration under ISO 20486:2019 is limited, so a pressurised leak test is mandatory for each printed lot.
Threaded closure prototypes are printed in DM_8320 when the packaging group needs an opaque, rigid part for fit-and-seal iteration with HDPE or PET bottles. The digital-material ratio is fixed in the print job; no slip agent, lubricant, or nucleating agent is compounded into the resin. Threads are designed at 0.8 mm pitch or larger to avoid support entrapment; fine threads below 0.5 mm pitch tend to retain support and shift breakaway torque. Prototypes are post-processed with the OEM alkaline bath, neutralised, and then conditioned at 23°C and 50% RH for 24 h before torque testing. Application torque and removal torque are measured on a motorised torque tester calibrated under ISO 6789-2:2017; the torque retention behaviour is compared using ASTM D2063-12 procedures. Because the photopolymer is more notch-sensitive than polypropylene, tamper-evident band bridges are evaluated only as visual and dimensional analogues, not as mechanical certification. Compliance is limited to packaging development; no food-contact status under 21 CFR 177 or EU 10/2011 is claimed. The printed closures must not be used with food, beverage, or pharmaceutical product. The main production bottleneck is the limited working life of an opened resin cartridge; moisture uptake and viscosity drift occur if the cartridge is left beyond the machine OEM’s prescribed idle period. Batch-to-batch torque variation is controlled by printing all test caps in the same orientation on the same tray and recording print-head temperature. Published data for this specific configuration is limited; release criteria must be generated internally with torque retention protocols and dimensional checks aligned to ISO 286-1:2010.
Конкурентоспособные цены на жесткий непрозрачный прототипный полимер Proto3000 Objet Digital Materials™ DM_8320, которые соответствуют вашему бюджету - гибкие условия и индивидуальные котировки для каждого заказа.
Для получения образцов, цен или более подробной информации свяжитесь с нами по адресу +8618136850665 или отправить по почте admin@ascent-chem.com.
Мы ответим вам как можно скорее.
Телефон: +8618136850665
Электронная почта: admin@ascent-chem.com
Гибкие условия оплаты, конкурентоспособные цены, первоклассное обслуживание — обращайтесь прямо сейчас!
Proto3000 Objet Digital Materials™ DM_8320 Rigid Opaque Prototyping Polymer is a PolyJet-based rigid photopolymer identified within the Objet digital-material matrix. The DM_8320 code designates a software-blended, opaque rigid system rather than a single-cartridge unreinforced resin; its final Shore D range and tensile response depend on the base-resin pair, printhead health, and selected print mode. The material is used for dimensional prototypes, product mock-ups, master patterns for room-temperature moulding, and non-reflective visual inspection models where surface discontinuities must remain visible under diffuse illumination. Mechanical acceptance must be verified on actual build-platform specimens because digital-material properties vary with layer thickness, orientation, and support-removal protocol. Published data for this specific configuration is limited; the values cited below are class-level reference ranges unless linked to a DM_8320 lot certificate.
DM_8320 is dispensed through multi-material PolyJet hardware with separate base-resin channels and an internal formulation controlled by the printer’s Job Manager. In class-level behaviour, layer thickness is selectable between 16 µm and 30 µm; the thinner setting reduces visible stair-stepping on shallow contours but extends build time and increases support contact area. Jetting temperature, UV lamp irradiance, and roller speed are fixed by the system’s material matrix; manual override of these parameters is not recommended and may invalidate repeatability. Cartridge storage should remain in the manufacturer’s sealed packaging at 15–27 °C. Before loading, cartridges should be held at 18–25 °C for a minimum of 4 h to stabilize rheology; agitation is required to redisperse pigment in opaque systems. Production-scale observation on Connex-class systems shows that unshaken opaque cartridges can produce visible colour banding in parts with large flat surfaces, typically appearing as 20–30 mm wide streaks along the printhead travel axis.
Sacrificial support material is required for overhanging geometry and is removed using a low-pressure waterjet after initial spray and soak cycles; automated cleaning stations on PolyJet production lines typically operate below 40 °C to avoid thermal softening. Chemical support-removal agents are not required unless specified by the support material SDS. Thin walls below 1.0 mm should be supported along the full length to limit curl during UV cure; edges with a length-to-thickness ratio above 150:1 may lift off the tray if the chamber dew point exceeds specification. Support remnants on opaque surfaces reduce gloss uniformity and can artificially lower flexural strength by 5–15 % in three-point bending, so final measurement should follow the manufacturer’s post-processing sequence and a 40 h conditioning period under ISO 291.
Single-resin rigid photopolymers typically fix opacity and hardness by formulation at the resin-production stage, which means that any change in pigment loading or cross-link density affects both flow behaviour and final cure. DM_8320 uses digital blending to meter a rigid base with a modifying component during jetting, reducing the need for a separate pre-mixed grade for every hardness increment. The result is that Shore D hardness for this class is typically 83–86 when measured under ASTM D2240, while tensile modulus remains in the 2,200–3,200 MPa range under ASTM D638-14. In comparison, elastomeric digital materials occupy Shore A 27–95 and show tensile strengths below 10 MPa, making them unsuitable for load-bearing fixtures. Digital ABS has higher heat deflection, usually above 82 °C at 0.45 MPa, and better impact resistance; DM_8320 is therefore preferred when opacity and surface inspection matter more than elevated thermal exposure. The product should not be treated as isotropic: class-level Z-tensile values are typically 10–20 % lower than X-Y values at 30 µm layer thickness because inter-layer cure is incomplete relative to in-plane cross-linking.
Replacement of Digital ABS with DM_8320 is appropriate only after thermal and impact duty are re-evaluated using the actual part environment. Under ASTM D648-18 Method B at 0.45 MPa, class-level heat deflection temperature for opaque rigid PolyJet resins is 45–50 °C; Digital ABS materials can exceed 82 °C. Therefore, parts exposed to warm-water rinsing, instrument enclosure heat from halogen lamps, or enclosed interior conditions above 50 °C should not be substituted without thermal cycling. At ambient conditions, DM_8320 can provide greater colour consistency in opaque finishes and can reduce post-build sealing steps because its opacity hides internal support-removal marks. The absence of transparent clarity also eliminates transmitted-light inspection; if optical clarity is needed, a VeroClear or equivalent transparent material should be used instead. Published data for DM_8320-specific toughness versus Digital ABS is limited; comparative testing should follow ASTM D256-10 notched Izod with test plaques printed in both systems on the same machine.
Mechanical qualification of DM_8320 should be performed with specimen geometry defined by ISO 527-2:2012 Type 1A or ASTM D638-14 Type I, with build orientation and print mode recorded on the test report. The test speed should be 5 mm/min for tensile modulus in the initial linear region and 50 mm/min for elongation at break unless a different speed is specified by the material datasheet. A class-level data range for rigid opaque PolyJet media is 50–65 MPa tensile strength, 10–25 % elongation at break, 75–110 MPa flexural strength, and 20–30 J/m notched Izod impact. These values are not specific to DM_8320 lot performance; they provide an envelope for feasibility studies. Because moisture absorption can reach 1.1–1.5 % after 24 h immersion under ASTM D570-98, specimens should be conditioned at 23 ±2 °C and 50 ±5 % RH for 40 h before destructive testing. Hardness measurements should use a Shore D durometer on a 6 mm minimum thickness stack or according to the material supplier’s specimen plan.
| Property | Test method | Class-level published range |
|---|---|---|
| Tensile strength | ASTM D638-14 | 50–65 MPa |
| Elongation at break | ASTM D638-14 | 10–25 % |
| Flexural strength | ASTM D790-17 | 75–110 MPa |
| Flexural modulus | ASTM D790-17 | 2,200–3,200 MPa |
| Notched Izod impact | ASTM D256-10 | 20–30 J/m |
| Heat deflection temperature at 0.45 MPa | ASTM D648-18 Method B | 45–50 °C |
| Shore D hardness | ASTM D2240 | 83–86 |
| Water absorption after 24 h | ASTM D570-98 | 1.1–1.5 % |
Exposure to ketones, chlorinated solvents, esters, and aggressive polar solvents can induce crazing, softening, or dimensional change in rigid opaque photopolymers. Isopropanol used for support removal should be limited to short immersion intervals below 10 min unless tank agitation and solvent temperature are controlled; longer exposure can etch surfaces and reduce feature definition. Moisture uptake is class-level 1.1–1.5 % by mass at 24 h; this is generally reversible after desiccation but can alter dielectric properties in electrical housings. Continuous service temperature should remain below 45 °C under load and below 50 °C without significant stress. Autoclaving, dry-heat sterilization above 50 °C, and steam exposure are outside the operational boundary. When chemical resistance is required, immersion coupons should be tested according to ISO 175:2010 with the intended production fluid rather than extrapolating from generic solvent charts.
Parts printed with DM_8320 in the X-Y build plane have higher tensile strength than those loaded through the Z axis because PolyJet laminates cure layer by layer and retain an inter-layer interface. In published class-level anisotropy data for rigid opaque digital materials, Z tensile strength can be 10–20 % lower than X-Y values at 30 µm layers, and the gap can widen with insufficient UV dose or excessive layer thickness. Orientation planning should place critical snap-fit hooks, locating bosses, or threaded-insert bosses in the X-Y plane where possible. For parts with unavoidable Z-axis loading, a 16 µm layer mode and increased support contact may reduce the strength differential, but full-scale tensile validation remains necessary. The build tray location also matters: outer edges of large platforms may show greater dimensional variability because roller levelling forces and UV exposure are less uniform. On production Connex-class systems, parts requiring tightest tolerances are often positioned near the tray centre, while the outer 20–30 mm margin is reserved for less critical components or sacrificial perimeter walls.
| Verification area | Standard or regulation | Reporting requirement |
|---|---|---|
| Tensile verification | ISO 527-2:2012 | Report print mode, layer thickness, and build orientation |
| Flexural verification | ISO 178:2019 | Three-point bending, span-to-thickness ratio 16:1 |
| Thermal verification | ISO 75-2:2013 Method B | Heat deflection at 0.45 MPa, specimen thickness 6 mm |
| Impact verification | ASTM D256-10 | Notched Izod, X-Y and Z plaque comparison |
| REACH | EC 1907/2006 | Obtain updated SDS and SVHC statement from Proto3000 |
| RoHS | Directive 2011/65/EU | Verify compliance for electrical and electronic equipment applications |
| Food-contact suitability | 21 CFR 177.2600 / EC 10/2011 | Not automatic; require migration kinetics testing under end-use temperature and food simulant |
Documentation for DM_8320 should include the material lot number, printer serial number, raw-material cartridge lot, print mode, layer thickness, and post-processing history. When comparative studies are run against other rigid opaque photopolymers or Digital ABS, the same build tray, support-removal operator, and conditioning protocol should be used to reduce confounding variables. Published data for DM_8320-specific configuration may be limited; therefore, generated internal data sets are the authoritative basis for release in production-facing prototypes.