| Код ТН ВЭД | 158735 |
Как аккредитованная фабрика Proto3000 Objet Digital Materials™ DM_9850/9750 для прототипирования резиноподобных полимеров, мы соблюдаем строгие протоколы качества - каждая партия подвергается строгим испытаниям для обеспечения последовательных стандартов эффективности и безопасности.
| Упаковка | |
| Доставка | |
| Хранение |
Proto3000 Objet Digital Materials™ DM_9850/9750 Rubber-like Prototyping Polymer is evaluated below in six downstream prototyping scenarios where the material is jetted as a photopolymer and used as a surrogate for moulded or cast elastomers before production tooling is commissioned. Published data for this specific configuration is limited; critical print parameters and mechanical values should be confirmed on the user’s PolyJet system and post-processing line.
Earbud and wearable fit-validation programmes use DM_9850/9750 as a 100% solids photopolymer rather than a compounded thermoplastic elastomer. The applicable compliance framework for short-term external skin contact is ISO 10993-1:2018 clause 5.2 surface-device categorisation and ISO 10993-5:2009 L929 cytotoxicity screening where leachables are assessed. The formulation addition ratio remains 0 phr plasticiser, 0 phr filler, and 0 phr reactive diluent; any change in durometer is generated by the PolyJet Digital Materials matrix through voxel-level combination with rigid Vero-family resin, not by mixing in the cartridge. The downstream production process begins with anthropometric data captured by 3D scanning, then the STL is oriented and nested in a Connex3/J750 class PolyJet system using support material cleared for the DM series. After build, support is removed with water-jet equipment or an aqueous alkaline bath at the support material SDS condition, and the parts are conditioned at 23 °C and 50% RH for at least 24 h before Shore A measurement under ASTM D2240-15e1. Terminal products are earbud tip prototypes, wristband link flexures, and VR headset facial-interface mockups. The principal failure observed in service is tearing of walls below the support-removal practical limit during high-pressure water cleanout; this threshold must be determined on the user’s system because published data for this specific configuration is limited.
For automotive connector-seal and HVAC grommet prototyping, the resin replaces an injection-moulded TPV during pre-tooling fit trials. The governing evaluation standards include ASTM D2000-18 M classification for automotive rubber products, ISO 3795:1989 for interior flammability, and ASTM D395-18 Method B for compression set. In formulation terms, the material is printed at 100% infill with no blowing agent or process oil; the elastomer is used as-polymerised, and the only ratio adjustment is the digital blending of DM_9850/9750 with a rigid PolyJet model material in the printer software when a higher-durometer seal carrier is required. The downstream process selects a 16 µm or 30 µm layer profile in the job manager, builds the part with matte finish to reduce sidewall scattering, removes support with a water-jet unit or a 2% sodium hydroxide bath at ambient temperature, and compresses the seal inside a milled aluminium groove simulating the production connector housing. Insertion and extraction force traces are recorded on a universal testing machine at 50 mm/min crosshead speed; compression set is checked after 22 h at 70 °C and 25% deflection. Terminal parts are firewall pass-through grommets, connector peripheral seals, and HVAC servo-flap overmould prototypes. First articles after an idle printhead have shown surface tack and reduced UV conversion; printed seal batches should be wiped with isopropyl alcohol and visually inspected before dimensional testing, and any white-light scanning after solvent exposure is repeated only after evaporation is complete.
Patient-specific anatomical models printed from DM_9850/9750 are used in surgical planning and resident education where the primary requirement is transient soft-tissue compression and return, not long-term biological contact. The relevant quality and risk framework is ISO 13485:2016 for the model production workflow, ISO 14971:2019 for training-simulator risk management, and institutional review board protocols for patient-derived imaging; material biocompatibility is not claimed, and the part is not considered a body-contact medical device. Formulation addition ratio is 0 wt% radiopaque filler, 0 wt% plasticiser, and 0 wt% crosslinking promoter; the material remains as-supplied because adding barium sulfate or iodine-based contrast agents would change both rheology and jetting performance and would not make the printed model suitable for fluoroscopy. The downstream production process starts with DICOM segmentation in image-processing software, followed by STL smoothing to reduce stair-stepping artefacts in thin vascular walls, oblique orientation to balance support access and layer shear planes, printing in a Connex3/J750 class system, and support removal from lumens with a water bath and low-pressure irrigation. Finished models are dried and optionally surfaced with a thin water-based coating when high-gloss tissue boundaries are required. Terminal products include hepatobiliary training models, cardiac soft-tissue replicas, and vascular access task trainers. The operational boundary is that steam autoclaving at 121 °C is not permitted; any heat or solvent sterilisation causes permanent dimensional drift.
| Scenario | Standard or code | Test condition / clause | Evaluation boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wearable fit validation | ISO 10993-5:2009, ASTM D2240-15e1 | 23 °C, 50% RH, 24 h conditioning | External short-term skin contact only; no USP Class VI claim |
| Automotive seal prototyping | ASTM D2000-18, ASTM D395-18 Method B | 22 h at 70 °C, 25% deflection | Pre-production fit trials; not a PPAP material submission |
| Anatomical simulator | ISO 13485:2016, ISO 14971:2019 | DICOM-segmented model workflow | No sterilisation, no implantation, no mucosal contact |
| Food-packaging soft gripper | ISO 12100:2010, EN ISO 13849-1:2015, FDA 21 CFR 177.2600 | Cyclic actuation with bubble leak test | No direct contact with unpackaged food |
| Footwear midsole lattice | ISO 868:2003, ISO 17707:2005, ASTM D395-18 | Compression hysteresis loop at 25% strain | Prototype test coupon; not production footwear material |
| Static O-ring fixture | ISO 3601-1:2012, ISO 3601-3:2005, ASTM D1414-15 | Nitrogen leak-down at 0.1 bar gauge | Static low-pressure sealing only; no dynamic high-pressure seal use |
Soft-robotic end-effector trials for food packaging require a gripper that can handle delicate produce without bruising; DM_9850/9750 is printed as a pneumatic bellows and evaluated for burst pressure, cycle life, and channel cleanout before a final injection-moulded TPU is commissioned. The compliance route follows ISO 12100:2010 for machinery risk assessment and EN ISO 13849-1:2015 for safety-related control functions; if the end-effector is trialled near unpackaged food, FDA 21 CFR 177.2600 is the relevant reference standard for rubber articles intended for repeated food contact, but DM_9850/9750 is not certified for direct food contact and must not touch unpackaged product. Formulation addition ratio is 0 phr blowing agent, 0 phr thixotrope, and 0 phr plasticiser; wall compliance is altered only by CAD geometry and digital-material durometer changes, not by solvent softening or silicone oil post-treatment. The downstream production process models the actuator with internal channels of continuously variable cross-section, prints in a Connex3/J750 class system, flushes support material from internal galleries using water at 30 °C and filtered air at 0.2 bar, and then performs a bubble leak test before cyclic actuation on a digital pressure regulator. Internal channel diameter is adjusted based on measured Ra of the printed wall, and the pressure drop is calculated using the Darcy-Weisbach equation. Terminal products include soft gripper fingers, bellows-type actuator prototypes, and vacuum-assist robotic end-effector seals. Published data for this specific configuration is limited; burst-pressure acceptance criteria are therefore derived experimentally on the user’s line rather than from an ISO standard.
In sports footwear development, DM_9850/9750 is used to fabricate lattice midsole prototypes whose force-deflection response approximates a foamed EVA or TPU midsole without tooling. The applicable compliance anchors are ISO 868:2003 Shore A hardness, ISO 17707:2005 flexing endurance for finished footwear specimens, and ASTM D395-18 compression set under 25% strain. The formulation addition ratio is 0 phr chemical blowing agent and 0 phr filler; foaming is not created by gas evolution but by CAD-defined cell structures of gyroid or diamond lattices, so the ratio is a cell-volume fraction rather than an additive level. The downstream production process orients the midsole with lattice struts at an angle to the build plane to minimise shear failure between layers, prints at the highest reproducible layer profile for the material, supports large cell voids with water-soluble support material, and cleans the part in an ultrasonic bath at a temperature below 30 °C followed by positive air-flow drying. Compression testing is performed with flat platens on a universal testing machine to generate a hysteresis loop; energy return and compression set are calculated from the resulting force-displacement curve. Terminal products include midsole test coupons, heel stabiliser prototypes, and orthotic assessment shells. The operational limitation is that strut diameters below the support-removal threshold and cell walls thinner than the minimum printable feature cause cell closure and artificial stiffening; published data for this specific lattice configuration is limited.
Static O-ring and face-seal prototypes in fluid handling equipment are printed from DM_9850/9750 to populate a quick-selection kit before injection-moulded FKM or NBR production seals are ordered. The governing standards are ISO 3601-1:2012 for O-ring cross-section and groove dimensions, ISO 3601-3:2005 for surface imperfections, and ASTM D1414-15 for O-ring tensile and compression testing. Formulation addition ratio is 0 wt% reinforcing filler, 0 wt% processing aid, and 0 wt% internal release agent; because the part is not moulded, there is no mould-fouling or cure-system adjustment, and no plasticiser migration can alter hardness during storage. The downstream production process prints a suite of toroidal parts on a single build tray with the parting line orientation set to avoid seal-face plane roughness, removes support from the inner diameter using a water-jet unit or alkaline bath, and inspects sealing surfaces with a stylus profilometer before installation in milled ISO 3601-1:2012 grooves. Leak-down tests are run with nitrogen at 0.1 bar gauge, and the printed seals are compared with reference moulded elastomers for extraction force and compression set. Terminal products include O-ring prototype kits, static face-seal samples, and pump diaphragm test articles. Printed surface roughness remains the dominant variable in low-pressure sealing trials; the user should specify matte versus glossy mode deliberately and measure Ra at the seal contact band rather than assuming equivalence with moulded elastomers. The use of this polymer in dynamic high-pressure sealing is excluded until validated on the target system.
Конкурентоспособные цены на Proto3000 Objet Digital Materials™ DM_9850/9750 Резиноподобные прототипные полимеры, которые соответствуют вашему бюджету - гибкие условия и индивидуальные котировки для каждого заказа.
Для получения образцов, цен или более подробной информации свяжитесь с нами по адресу +8618136850665 или отправить по почте admin@ascent-chem.com.
Мы ответим вам как можно скорее.
Телефон: +8618136850665
Электронная почта: admin@ascent-chem.com
Гибкие условия оплаты, конкурентоспособные цены, первоклассное обслуживание — обращайтесь прямо сейчас!
Objet Digital Materials™ DM_9850/9750 Rubber-like Prototyping Polymer is a PolyJet photopolymer package supplied under two digital blend designations. The DM_9850 order code corresponds to a cured indentation hardness of 85 Shore A, and the DM_9750 order code corresponds to 75 Shore A, as specified in the manufacturer’s digital material selection guide. The material is not supplied as a single pre-compounded resin but as a paired combination of an elastomeric Tango-series acrylate oligomer and a rigid Vero-series acrylate oligomer. These two streams are jetted separately and mixed in a voxel-level digital ratio at the build plane to produce a cured network with intermediate elastomer-like behavior. Because the blend ratio is controlled by the printer’s job-parameter file rather than by a batch compounding operation, the same cartridge set can generate multiple Shore A values when the build software is reprogrammed. The designation “Rubber-like” in this context refers to the cured material’s low- to mid-durometer response, not to a thermoplastic elastomer or silicone elastomer. The cured structure is a UV-polymerized acrylate network with glassy Vero domains distributed within a soft Tango phase; the resulting morphology approximates an interpenetrating network rather than a conventional melt-processed TPE. DM_9850 requires a higher Vero fraction than DM_9750, which raises crosslink density, increases stiffness, and reduces recoverable strain. Hardness is measured under ASTM D2240-15(2021) on conditioned specimens; density is evaluated under ISO 1183-1:2019, Method A. Tensile and tear data should be taken from the current Objet/Stratasys digital-material datasheet because published data for this specific configuration is limited to grade-specific manufacturer documentation.
The primary difference between the two grades is the ratio of rigid Vero oligomer to elastomeric Tango oligomer in the printed voxel matrix. DM_9850 contains a sufficient Vero fraction to raise the cured durometer to 85 Shore A; DM_9750 produces 75 Shore A. The increase in Vero content does not produce a simple linear stiffening effect because the rigid domains constrain the soft Tango network in a non-linear manner. Tensile modulus rises as the Vero fraction increases, while elongation at break and tear resistance may decrease once the glassy domains percolate. For DM_9850, the material behaves more like a hard rubber or soft engineering plastic; it is selected when a prototype must resist fingernail indentation, maintain geometry under clamp compression, or replicate a commercial elastomer in the 80–90 Shore A window. DM_9750 is selected for lower-durometer gaskets, flexible couplings, soft-touch housings, and parts that must conform to irregular mating surfaces. Under cyclic loading, the higher crosslink density of DM_9850 reduces viscoelastic damping but increases heat buildup at high strain rates. DM_9750 exhibits higher viscous loss and greater recovery after low-rate deformation. Because the two grades share the same Tango and Vero base chemistry, their chemical resistance, moisture equilibrium, and UV stability are closer than their mechanical stiffness might suggest. The relevant test standards for comparing the grades are ISO 37:2017 for tensile strength and elongation, ASTM D412-16 Die C for elastomer tensile behavior, and ASTM D624-00(2020) Die C for tear resistance. Specimen conditioning is typically performed at 23 ± 2 °C and 50 ± 5 % relative humidity for at least 24 h before testing.
For design iterations requiring variable durometer within a single part, the two grades can be jetted in the same build sequence only if the printer supports multi-material digital blending. In this situation, DM_9850 and DM_9750 are not post-machined or glued; the material transition is generated at the voxel level by changing the droplet ratio in the job file. The boundary between 85 Shore A and 75 Shore A regions can be made sharp or graded, depending on the software assignment. However, the transition region may exhibit anisotropic mechanical behavior because the droplet-scale distribution of rigid and soft resin follows the printhead raster direction. Specimens extracted parallel to the X-axis can give different modulus values from specimens extracted along the Y-axis at the same nominal grade. This orientation effect is measurable with ISO 37:2017 Type 4 specimens and should be quantified before using DM_9850/DM_9750 for functional sealing prototypes.
The DM_9850 and DM_9750 digital packages require an Objet Connex-series or Stratasys J-series PolyJet printer with multi-material jetting capability. The two cartridge resins are heated to the standard jetting temperature window, typically 70–75 °C, to bring their viscosity into the range required for consistent drop formation. At the printhead, the droplets are deposited in a digital matrix; the Tango-rich voxels and Vero-rich voxels are interspersed according to the selected Shore A value. A UV source curing unit passes over the deposited layer to polymerize the acrylate network before the next layer is jetted. The standard layer-thickness options on Connex platforms are 16 µm in high-quality mode and 30 µm in high-speed mode; the digital material may be restricted to one of these modes depending on the printer model and material license file. Printhead condition is a critical production variable. Batch-to-batch viscosity drift, partially clogged nozzles, or insufficient printhead voltage calibration produce missing jets that appear as surface voids and local soft spots. On production-scale lines using Connex500-class systems with 8 printheads, daily head calibration and a test-print module are used to maintain droplet placement accuracy. When jetting stability is lost, the cured part may show striations parallel to the scan direction, non-uniform Shore A readings, and poor sealing behavior at gasket flanges. These failures are observed even when the digital blend ratio is correct, indicating that the printing process controls the final network morphology as much as the resin chemistry.
After the build finishes, the support material is removed with a pressurized water jet rather than a solvent bath. The uncured residue is minimal if the tray temperature and UV dose are within specification; under-cured surfaces may remain tacky because of oxygen inhibition at the air-layer interface. A post-build stabilization period of 24 h at 23 °C ± 2 °C is recommended before dimensional inspection because the material may undergo slight volume relaxation after support removal. DM_9850 and DM_9750 do not require thermal post-curing for standard prototyping use; elevated-temperature exposure above the manufacturer’s recommended limit can darken the resin, increase brittleness, and alter Shore A readings. Cleaning of printed parts should be limited to isopropyl alcohol wipes or brief immersion; ketone-based solvents can swell the network and reduce tear resistance.
The DM_9850/DM_9750 package is used for short-run gasket fabrication, dust seal prototyping, overmolded grip simulation, wearable device straps, cable strain-relief boots, footbed cushioning trials, and soft-touch control surfaces. In sealing applications, the printed gasket can be compressed between rigid flanges and tested under ASTM F36-15 to determine compressibility and recovery. The material is not a direct substitute for platinum-catalyzed liquid silicone rubber or compression-molded RTV silicone in high-temperature sealing applications. Silicone elastomers generally offer lower compression set, higher tear strength, and broader thermal stability than acrylate-based PolyJet digital materials. The DM grades are also not intended for repeated steam autoclave cycling, continuous hot-oil exposure, or high-velocity dynamic sealing where hysteresis heat generation may exceed the network’s thermal resistance. For these reasons, DM_9850/DM_9750 parts are best used for form, fit, and limited functional testing rather than long-term production service.
Compared with single-cartridge TangoPlus FLX930 or TangoBlackPlus FLX980, DM_9850 and DM_9750 are stiffer and exhibit lower elongation because of the Vero fraction incorporated into the digital matrix. The single-cartridge Tango materials cure to a much lower Shore A range and are used when a very soft, highly flexible prototype is required. Conversely, the Vero-series rigid photopolymers are much harder and more brittle than DM_9850/DM_9750. The digital material thus fills the intermediate durometer band between soft Tango and rigid Vero. The presence of two product codes in one package indicates that the buyer receives either both Shore A variants or a selected variant under a shared resin family, not that the two grades are identical. In a multi-material build, the two grades may be combined only if the machine configuration includes the appropriate resin cartridges and a digital material license.
| Property or requirement | Method/standard | Specimen condition |
|---|---|---|
| Cured indentation hardness | ASTM D2240-15(2021) | 23 ± 2 °C, 50 ± 5 % RH, 6.0 mm thickness |
| Tensile strength and elongation | ISO 37:2017 / ASTM D412-16 Die C | 500 mm/min, 23 °C |
| Tear resistance | ASTM D624-00(2020) Die C | 500 mm/min |
| Density | ISO 1183-1:2019 Method A | 23 °C |
| RoHS restricted substances | Directive 2011/65/EU Annex II | Homogeneous polymer |
| REACH SVHC disclosure | Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 Article 33 | Candidate list as notified |
Storage of unopened cartridges should follow the manufacturer’s recommended temperature band of 15–27 °C with protection from direct UV and sunlight. Cartridge shelf life is commonly 12 months from the date of manufacture when stored in the sealed original container. Once a cartridge is loaded into the printhead system, the material should be used within the printer’s recommended open-cartridge interval to avoid viscosity drift from ambient moisture absorption. Moisture uptake in the uncured acrylate can alter jetting rheology, reduce cure conversion, and produce a tacky surface on finished parts. Equipment-level experience indicates that high relative humidity above 60 % in the print environment may require more frequent printhead purges and test prints. The material is supplied in sealed PolyJet cartridges with RFID tags that allow the printer to track material type, batch, and remaining volume; this reduces the risk of using an expired cartridge or a mismatched digital pair. The RFID data also supports traceability under ISO 9001:2015 production control requirements when the printed parts are used for functional prototype validation.
In industrial practice, the DM_9850 grade is selected when a prototype must survive assembly with threaded fasteners, snap-fit engagement, or metal insert retention without excessive deformation. The DM_9750 grade is selected when a component must bend repeatedly, seal against a rough cast surface, or recover from finger deflection without cracking. The choice between the two should be based on a measured force-deflection curve from a physical test coupon rather than durometer alone, because two photopolymer blends with the same nominal Shore A value can differ in hysteresis, tear strength, and compression set. When test coupons are printed on the same tray with the same digital ratio, the mechanical response may still vary by up to several percentage points depending on tray position, UV lamp age, and support-removal waterjet pressure. These sources of variance are part of the process capability and should be considered if DM_9850/DM_9750 is used for short-run functional parts instead of display prototypes. No conclusion is reached here; the material’s suitability is determined by the specific seal geometry, environmental exposure, and cyclically applied deformation rate of the intended application.