| Код ТН ВЭД | 677184 |
Как аккредитованная фабрика по прозрачному прототипированию полимеров Proto3000 Objet Digital Materials™ DM_Grid_7523, мы соблюдаем строгие протоколы качества - каждая партия подвергается строгим испытаниям для обеспечения последовательных стандартов эффективности и безопасности.
| Упаковка | |
| Доставка | |
| Хранение |
Optically clear medical device housings manufactured with DM_Grid_7523 are built directly from the photopolymer at a formulation loading ratio of 100 wt% as supplied; no reactive diluent, plasticizer, or bulk filler is combined before jetting. This configuration supports the dimensional and transparency requirements of non-invasive device concept models, surgical planning units, and short-run diagnostic instrument covers. Compliance screening for limited-contact prototypes follows ISO 10993-5:2009 and ISO 10993-10:2021, with design controls documented under ISO 13485:2016 and risk management under ISO 14971:2019 for the prototype phase. Mechanical acceptance values for transparent housing prototypes are reviewed as comparative data against ASTM D638-14 and ISO 527-1:2019; no production design margin is assigned without lot-specific tensile and flexural datasets. The production process on a Stratasys J-series PolyJet system uses cartridge conditioning at 70–75 °C, a jetted layer thickness of 16 µm in High Quality mode, and immediate UV cure of each deposited layer with lamp output in the 325–365 nm range. Support material is removed by means of a low-pressure water jet at 4–8 bar followed by an aqueous cleaning cycle and isopropanol rinse; residual support mass fraction is held below 0.5 wt%, and the dried part is subjected to a supplemental UV post-cure of 30–60 min when maximum surface hardness is required. Production-scale equipment behaviour is dominated by printhead temperature stability and ambient humidity: on machines with 7.5 kg cartridge capacity, long unattended builds above 18 h at ambient relative humidity above 60% require a 24 h sealed conditioning step to prevent jetting loss at the head interface. Terminal finished-product prototypes include transparent device housing shells, anatomical surgical planning models derived from CT scan segmentation, orthodontic aligner model bases, dental try-in prototypes, and diagnostic instrument bezels. The main operational boundary is that full biocompatibility is not assumed from the base resin data; implantable and long-term skin-contact applications require material-specific biological evaluation and possibly a cleared biocompatible coating of 5–15 µm dry film thickness.
| Regulatory area | Downstream prototype type | Primary reference standard | Boundary of claim |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medical device limited-contact | Transparent housing / surgical model | ISO 10993-5:2009 | Not implantable; not long-term skin contact |
| Microfluidic visualisation | Open-channel flow cell | ISO 9001:2015, RoHS 2011/65/EU | Closed channels below 500 µm not recommended |
| Automotive lens prototype | Light pipe / diffuser surrogate | ASTM D1003-21, ISO 4892-2:2013 | Prototype photometric study only |
| Consumer electronics housing | Transparent cover / light bar | IEC 62368-1:2023, REACH 1907/2006 | Housing prototype only; not V-0 certification |
| Eyewear glazing prototype | Lens blank / frame dummy | ISO 12312-1:2022, ASTM D1003-21 | Lens category screening only; not safety-certified |
| Fluid manifold visual prototype | Flow-visualisation block | ISO 9001:2015, RoHS 2011/65/EU | Not PED-certified pressure equipment |
| Packaging prototype | Clear jar / bottle mock-up | EU 1935/2004, USP <661.1> | Migration testing required before food-contact use |
The principal restriction in closed-channel microfluidic prototyping with DM_Grid_7523 is the interaction between support removal chemistry and enclosed flow path topology. The polymer is processed at 100 wt% neat resin; no additional solvent is added to the formulation, so extraction of support material from closed channels narrower than 500 µm becomes incomplete, and published data for this specific configuration is limited. Compliance in non-clinical microfluidic work is bounded by ISO 9001:2015 and the RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU; if whole-cell or protein-adsorption assays are planned, pre-screening under ISO 10993-5:2009 is performed only as a feasibility check, and it does not certify compatibility with sensitive cell lines. The downstream production process for open-channel devices uses a 16 µm layer height, followed by water-based support removal at 40 °C in a neutral-pH cleaning solution and a final isopropanol rinse at ambient temperature. When a liquid-tight enclosure is required, the open channel is printed without a top closure and then laminated with a glass or COC cover sheet using a UV-curable optical adhesive applied at 0.2–0.5 g per linear metre with a controlled bondline of 50 ± 10 µm and a UVA cure dose of 1.5–3.0 J/cm². Terminal finished-product types include droplet generator prototypes with T-junction geometry, flow-cell visualisation blocks, lab-on-chip teaching kits, and reagent manifold mock-ups where flow path transparency is used to validate filling behaviour. The material is not recommended for closed channels below 500 µm or for organic solvent-rich continuous phases above 40 °C because solvent-induced stress cracking at channel walls can release debris into the fluid path.
Because automotive light pipe tooling generates high modification expense when output beam uniformity fails late-stage photometry, DM_Grid_7523 is used at 100 wt% as-supplied to produce lens and light-guide surrogate geometries before PMMA tooling. The part is processed on a PolyJet machine with a layer height of 16 µm, then hand-polished and coated with a UV-blocking clear acrylic topcoat at 5–15 µm dry film thickness; the coating step is the only formulation addition, and it is applied only after solvent cleaning. Compliance for luminous transmittance and haze is measured according to ASTM D1003-21; accelerated weathering performance is compared against ISO 4892-2:2013 Method A, while prototype optical tests use SAE J576 as a conditional reference for transparent lens materials. The downstream production process includes initial build at 16 µm for radii and pillow-light features, dry sanding from 600 grit to 3000 grit, machine polishing with a two-stage aqueous compound, and a final clear-coat cure schedule of 24 h at 23 ± 2 °C before goniophotometric assessment at C-plane 0–180° and H-plane 0–180° in 5° increments against a PMMA reference coupon. Terminal product types include DRL diffuser prototypes, tail-lamp inner lens renders, fog lamp light pipe models, and headlamp bezel transparency checks. The operational boundary is UV and thermal ageing: DM_Grid_7523 is not a homologated lens material, and prolonged exposure above 70 °C or to high-UV automotive cycles can produce yellowing and transmission loss that must be separated from design-driven photometric issues.
Consumer electronics prototype enclosures fabricated from DM_Grid_7523 serve as transparent covers, light-ring diffusers, and optoelectronic windows before production-grade coated PC or PMMA is selected. The formulation loading is 100 wt% unmodified resin; for parts where a soft-touch lip is co-jetted, the transparent material share is held at 70–90 wt% of the digital material composition, though published data for DM_Grid_7523 in this precise co-jetted configuration is limited. The downstream production process begins with a 30 µm rapid-iteration mode for form checks and then switches to 16 µm for surface-critical lens covers; support material is removed with a neutral-pH aqueous solution, and the exterior is polished with fine-grit films until ASTM D1003-21 haze measurements are taken under a standard illuminant. Compliance for the electronic assembly is reviewed under IEC 62368-1:2023 for the housing prototype, RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU for restricted substances, and REACH Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 Article 33 communication for SVHC content. The final cleared surfaces are tested on an integrating sphere photometer to document total luminous transmittance and diffuse scatter before trade study sign-off. Terminal products include smart-home sensor window prototypes, wearable device display covers, router light-bar diffusers, and transparent IoT gateway lid prototypes. The main incompatibility arises with amine-bearing cleaning fluids and strong alkaline solutions; such contact can produce surface haze and should be avoided before optical characterisation. Equipment-dependent failure modes observed on multi-material builds include local support resin carryover into transparent regions when wiper blade service intervals exceed 500 build hours.
Visually, the main source of eyeglass prototype rejection is not geometry deviation but surface haze and insufficient optical flatness after support removal. In this context, DM_Grid_7523 is processed at 100 wt% neat resin and is not compounded with internal release agents; when tinted, the dye addition is performed after polymerisation by immersion in a water-soluble dye bath containing 0.5–2.0 g/L of solvent dye at 50 ± 5 °C for 2–5 min. Optical acceptance follows ASTM D1003-21 for haze and total luminous transmittance, while spectral transmittance curves are compared with ISO 12312-1:2022 lens categories on a prototype basis; the material is not submitted for safety eyewear certification. The downstream production process involves printing the lens blank at 16 µm layer thickness, dry-blocking support residue with 800–1500 grit sanding films, machine polishing with an acrylic-compatible compound until surface roughness Ra is below 0.1 µm on a stylus profilometer, then edge grinding to the frame contour with a CNC lens edger. Terminal product types include eyeglass frame prototypes with clear dummy lenses, ski goggle lens mock-ups, safety shield concept models, and AR/VR optical path housings where a transparent protective window is required for camera testing. The inherent boundary is that the photopolymer is less scratch-resistant than hard-coated allyl diglycol carbonate or polycarbonate; pencil-gauge surface hardness on this material is not a production lens replacement specification and must not be used for ballistic or shatter-resistance claims.
Chemical process equipment prototyping with transparent manifolds frequently needs a transparent acrylic-like block through which dosing rates and phase separation can be observed under normal laboratory pressure. DM_Grid_7523 is used at 100 wt% neat resin without addition of fumed silica or rheology modifiers; if chemical resistance beyond the base photopolymer is required, a clear epoxy liner of 100–200 µm may be applied to wetted surfaces, but adhesion must first be checked on a representative flat coupon. The production process is a PolyJet build at 16 µm layer height with internal bores oriented vertically to reduce support entrapment; after support removal with a water jet and mild neutral-pH detergent wash, the manifold is dried at 40 °C for 12 h and then subjected to a 1–3 bar pneumatic leak check with the part immersed in water to identify wall porosity, holding pressure for 5 min at a differential decay threshold of 0.05 bar/min. Compliance for this type of non-certified prototype is governed by ISO 9001:2015 and RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU; it is outside the scope of the PED 2014/68/EU unless a pressure vessel category is assigned by a notified body. Terminal product types include visual flow blocks for water treatment pilot skids, transparent pump volute prototypes, filter housing concept models, and dosing manifold mock-ups for laboratory fluidics. The material should not be exposed to strong oxidising acids, aromatic hydrocarbons, or ester-based solvents above 35 °C, because swelling and microcracking can occur at internal radiused transitions. Build orientation strongly affects internal wall quality: horizontal bores below 3 mm diameter show measurable roundness deviation after support removal, and published data for corrective post-machining on this specific formulation is limited.
Cosmetic and pharmaceutical package prototyping uses DM_Grid_7523 to produce water-clear jars, bottles, and closure over-mock-ups that allow fill-line and drop-test studies before multi-cavity tooling. The formulation loading remains 100 wt% as supplied; no UV absorber or mould release is added because the primary requirement is baseline clarity. Compliance for packaging articles is reviewed against EU Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 for food-contact materials as a design-input screen, USP <661.1> for plastic packaging physicochemical tests, and FDA 21 CFR 174–178 indirect food additive structure only as a reference; the base photopolymer is not assumed to be food-contact approved and requires migration testing before use with actual product matrices. The downstream process builds container prototypes at 16 µm layer height with neck threads and snap-fit closures in the same build; support material is removed from the interior through neck openings, which limits the practical minimum neck diameter to 18 mm for reliable cleaning. After support removal, the parts are conditioned at 23 ± 2 °C and 50 ± 10% RH for 48 h before closure torque testing at 0.8–1.2 N·m. Terminal product types include transparent jar prototypes for skin cream, cosmetic bottle mock-ups for viscous lotions, child-resistant closure demonstration models, and premium display packaging inserts. The main limitation is that long-term solvent contact with alcohol-rich formulations or essential oil headspace above 30 °C can induce surface microcracking and should be included in accelerated compatibility tests rather than extrapolated from neat resin data.
Конкурентные цены на прозрачный прототипный полимер Proto3000 Objet Digital Materials™ DM_Grid_7523, которые соответствуют вашему бюджету - гибкие условия и индивидуальные котировки для каждого заказа.
Для получения образцов, цен или более подробной информации свяжитесь с нами по адресу +8618136850665 или отправить по почте admin@ascent-chem.com.
Мы ответим вам как можно скорее.
Телефон: +8618136850665
Электронная почта: admin@ascent-chem.com
Гибкие условия оплаты, конкурентоспособные цены, первоклассное обслуживание — обращайтесь прямо сейчас!
The Proto3000 Objet Digital Materials™ DM_Grid_7523 Transparent Prototyping Polymer is a digital photopolymer system identified by the material code DM_Grid_7523 within the Objet Digital Materials range for PolyJet material jetting equipment. The designation is associated with transparent prototyping rather than opaque or high-temperature digital materials. No full engineering datasheet for this exact formulation was located in public supplier literature at the time of writing; published data for this specific configuration is limited, and the following operational detail separates general PolyJet behaviour from material-specific values that must be confirmed with Proto3000.
Material jetting build platforms for this class typically process photopolymer cartridges through temperature-controlled printheads, with layer thicknesses on high-resolution rigid modes commonly selectable at 16 µm or 30 µm. The exact validated layer thickness for DM_Grid_7523 should be confirmed from the printer compatibility matrix because not all Objet Digital Materials grades are released for every printhead, roller assembly, or UV-lamp configuration. Build chamber environmental control commonly falls between 18 °C and 25 °C with relative humidity limits specified by the equipment manufacturer; deviation outside this window can shift jetting viscosity and interfere with roller-planarized layer formation.
A production-scale build station should record resin lot, printhead serial number, UV lamp age, ambient relative humidity, and support-material lot because transparent digital materials show batch-to-batch differences in wetting on the build tray and in support-release force. When multiple PolyJet machines are used for the same part, the same part orientation and printer model should be used across the fleet; otherwise jetting width, roller pressure, and lamp energy differences introduce within-part variation that is visible in transparent sections.
In continuous production, a loss of more than 1 % to 2 % in UV lamp output can create underexposed areas within grid-defined layers, leaving soft internal surfaces that deform during support removal. Operators typically log lamp energy against machine count and replace lamps before the low-energy threshold is reached. At the printhead, a local temperature drift of ±2 °C from the resin setpoint can disrupt drop-ligament formation and produce missing jet lines at the start of a build. The use of a grid or patterned digital material also increases visual stitching risk at the interface between adjacent jetting passes if pass overlap and UV compensation are not tuned for the formulation’s shrinkage behaviour.
The core difference is architectural: a conventional transparent prototyping resin such as a VeroClear-class material is jetted as a single photopolymer composition and cured into a nominally isotropic polymer matrix. A digital material designated as DM_Grid_7523 is expected to derive its final properties from the combination of two or more component resins and from the spatial arrangement of those resins in the printed voxel field. This means the measured stiffness, elongation at break, and optical transmission can vary with print orientation, shear direction in the printhead, and grid-period selection in the slicing workflow. No published quantitative stiffness or light-transmission curves for DM_Grid_7523 were available in open literature; direct tensile testing to ASTM D638-14 or ISO 527-1:2019 on printed specimens is required to establish a material control envelope.
Compared with silicone-reinforced or high-temperature digital grades, the DM_Grid_7523 designation is positioned for transparent prototyping rather than load-bearing opaque end-use parts. The absence of published filler data suggests the system is expected to maintain higher optical clarity than filled or opaque digital materials, but trade-offs in heat-deflection temperature, surface hardness, and chemical resistance should be assumed until measured. If a grid architecture is printed inside a transparent housing, the difference between the grid regions and the surrounding clear matrix can create localized residual stress following UV cure, which may produce birefringence observable under polarized light.
For comparison, a monolithic VeroClear-class transparent material is jetted as one composition and polished to a clear state; a digital material labelled with a grid architecture implies two or more resin states or deposition behaviours within the printed voxel pattern. In that case the final part cannot be treated as a homogeneous sheet. Tensile, flexural, and impact values are orientation-dependent, and the interface between the transparent bulk and the grid regions acts as a crack path under load. Public VeroClear-class tensile strength has been reported in the range of 50 MPa to 65 MPa, with heat-deflection temperature near 45 °C to 50 °C at 0.45 MPa, but those values demonstrate the property class and do not transfer to DM_Grid_7523.
| Property or behaviour | Standard method | Reporting status for DM_Grid_7523 |
|---|---|---|
| Tensile properties | ASTM D638-14 / ISO 527-1:2019 | Published vendor datasheet limited; direct verification required |
| Flexural properties | ISO 178:2019 | Published vendor datasheet limited; direct verification required |
| Density | ISO 1183-1:2019 | Published vendor datasheet limited; direct verification required |
| Shore hardness | ISO 868 | Published vendor datasheet limited; direct verification required |
| Heat-deflection temperature | ISO 75-2:2013 | Published vendor datasheet limited; direct verification required |
| Light transmittance and haze | ASTM D1003-21 | Published vendor datasheet limited; polished coupon data required |
| Water absorption | ISO 62:2008 | Published vendor datasheet limited; immersion conditioning required |
Clear PolyJet materials generally require abrasive polishing after support removal to reach optical transparency. The as-built vertical surfaces scatter transmitted light and appear translucent, even when the polymer bulk is transparent. Published surface-roughness values for DM_Grid_7523 are not available; polished coupons should be prepared with a sequential abrasive treatment until the desired haze level is achieved. Total luminous transmittance and haze are measured with ASTM D1003-21, and yellowness change under exposure can be assessed with ASTM E313-20.
Internal grid features cannot be polished. If internal grid lines are printed perpendicular to the light path, they can behave as shadowing or diffraction features; if printed parallel, internal reflection at grid-matrix interfaces may reduce axial transmission. For parts intended as light pipes or transparent covers, print orientation must therefore be frozen in the build file and retained through polishing, because rotating the part after build changes the pattern direction and shifts the optical result.
Prolonged exposure to natural sunlight or broadband UV sources increases yellowness index in many acrylate photopolymers. No published yellowing kinetics for DM_Grid_7523 were located, so UV exposure testing should be performed at the application’s actual irradiance and temperature. Optical testing should be conducted on the same wall thickness, grid density, and post-process sequence as the final part; thin test plaques do not capture internal haze sources.
Post-processing with a water-jet station is used to remove PolyJet support structures following a build. For transparent digital materials containing internal grid structures, water-jet pressure applied through small ports can dislodge partially cured support trapped in narrow lattice cells. A conservative practice is to irrigate with deionized water at low pressure until the support material is fully flushed, then dry in a temperature-controlled cabinet below the vendor-specified heat-deflection limit. If ultrasonic cleaning is used, the bath should be restricted to vendor-approved media; isopropanol and other polar organic solvents can plasticize or craze acrylate-rich photopolymer surfaces when exposed for extended periods.
Moisture uptake in clear photopolymer parts can influence dimensional stability and fit of snap features. Hygroscopic conditioning to ISO 1110 or immersion testing to ISO 62:2008 should be performed when DM_Grid_7523 parts will operate in humid environments. Published equilibrium moisture content for this exact grade was not located, so design allowances must be derived from measured values on printed coupons exposed to the end-use humidity profile. Parts stored in an unsealed state at relative humidity above 60 % should be dimensionally stabilized before critical assembly.
If a transparent prototype carries clamped or threaded loads through a grid-defined region, tensile and flexural properties are not sufficient. The part should be tested in the installed configuration because crack initiation at the interface between grid-resin and transparent matrix is a known failure mode in multi-material photopolymer prints. Notched impact testing to ASTM D256-10 or Izod impact testing to ISO 180:2019 can be used to rank materials, but printed specimen orientation and grid orientation must be reported with the result.
Fatigue data for transparent digital photopolymers are scarce. In rotating or vibrating demonstration units, the onset of hairline cracks in transparent sections can occur after several thousand cycles; however, no published S-N curve for DM_Grid_7523 was identified. Static finite-element validation without measured flaw-tolerant fracture data creates risk in load-bearing transparent demonstrators. If cyclic loading is expected, coupon testing should include a minimum of three stress amplitudes and report failure location relative to the grid pattern.
Printed specimens must be prepared in orientation states that represent actual loading. A single flatwise tensile value derived from an XY-printed coupon does not bound Z-axis weakness or interface-dominated fracture. At minimum, flatwise, edgewise, and endwise printed specimens should be tested when the part is loaded in multiple directions. The test build should use the same layer thickness, support removal method, and post-cure storage condition as production prototypes.
For fluid-visualization manifolds, transparent housing prototypes, or optical covers, no pressure-retention, flow-velocity, or chemical-compatibility data for DM_Grid_7523 were located in public literature. Published data for this specific configuration is limited; any demonstration involving pressure, temperature, or solvent exposure should be preceded by burst testing and chemical exposure testing on printed samples. The absence of such data does not indicate failure, but it does mean the material cannot be treated as a qualified engineering polymer without further measurement.
The following documentation checklist identifies the standard designations that should be requested from the material supplier for production or regulated prototyping use. Because Proto3000 is a service and distribution entity, the polymer’s final release documentation may depend on the PolyJet equipment firmware, resin lot, and centralized material database installed on the printing system. A part built on an unsupported printhead configuration may produce mechanical properties outside the supplier’s published range.
| Area | Standard or regulation | Documentation required |
|---|---|---|
| Safety and hazardous constituents | REACH 1907/2006 | SDS and SVHC disclosure |
| Electrical/electronic equipment restrictions | Directive 2011/65/EU | RoHS declaration |
| Food-contact plastic migration | FDA 21 CFR 175-178 | Testing or vendor statement |
| Medical-device biological assessment | ISO 10993-1:2018 | Not required for general prototyping; should not be assumed |
| Quality management | ISO 9001:2015 | Vendor certificate of manufacture |
| Measurement of transparency | ASTM D1003-21 | Polished coupon transmittance and haze data |
Before committing to a regulated prototype build, request a certificate of analysis for the specific cartridge lot and a firmware-matching material menu verification for the platform. The material should not be combined with amine-containing cleaning agents unless compatibility has been confirmed, because nucleophilic amines can attack acrylate-ester linkages in photopolymer matrices. Storage and handling should follow the supplier’s cartridge orientation and temperature limits; photopolymer resins may degrade if exposed to direct sunlight or repeated freeze-thaw cycles before loading into the printhead.