| Код ТН ВЭД | 411608 |
Как аккредитованная RTP 2099 X 115375 B Impact Modified Bio-based Polylactic Acid/PMMA Alloy Factory, мы соблюдаем строгие протоколы качества - каждая партия подвергается строгим испытаниям для обеспечения последовательных стандартов эффективности и безопасности.
| Упаковка | |
| Доставка | |
| Хранение |
Конкурентные RTP 2099 X 115375 B Impact Modified Bio-based Polylactic Acid/PMMA Alloy цены, которые соответствуют вашему бюджету - гибкие условия и индивидуальные котировки для каждого заказа.
Для получения образцов, цен или более подробной информации свяжитесь с нами по адресу +8618136850665 или отправить по почте admin@ascent-chem.com.
Мы ответим вам как можно скорее.
Телефон: +8618136850665
Электронная почта: admin@ascent-chem.com
Гибкие условия оплаты, конкурентоспособные цены, первоклассное обслуживание — обращайтесь прямо сейчас!
RTP 2099 X 115375 B is a compounded impact-modified bio-based polylactic acid/polymethyl methacrylate alloy supplied in pellet form for injection molding and extrusion. The grade code is manufacturer-specific and does not constitute an ISO 1043 or ISO 11469 designation. The continuous PLA phase contributes renewable carbon; the PMMA phase is present as a secondary amorphous phase that modifies thermal response, surface hardness, and shrinkage behavior. The proprietary impact-modifier package is not fully disclosed on the technical datasheet, and published lot-independent data for this exact suffix is limited. Consequently, numerical values that appear later in this document are identified as family-typical ranges for compounded PLA/PMMA impact-modified systems with similar modifier architecture. They should not be interpreted as specification limits for any production lot.
The product is intended for applications requiring a balance of renewable carbon content, intermediate thermal resistance, and notched impact strength higher than that of unmodified PLA. Melt flow rate for this alloy class under ISO 1133-1:2022 at 210 °C/2.16 kg is generally in the range of 3–10 g/10 min; the exact value for RTP 2099 X 115375 B must be confirmed by certificate of analysis. Biogenic carbon fraction should be measured by ASTM D6866-21 or ISO 16620-2:2019 rather than calculated from the PLA mass fraction alone, because the PMMA phase and the impact modifier may be petroleum-derived unless separately certified.
PMMA raises the glass transition and softening response of the PLA matrix by forming an amorphous blend that restricts gross cold crystallization at service temperatures below 80 °C. In unmodified PLA, notched Izod values are generally 20–30 J/m under ASTM D256. An unmodified PLA/PMMA alloy improves surface hardness and dimensional stability but often remains relatively notch-sensitive. The impact modifier in the RTP 2099 X 115375 B system shifts failure mode toward ductile response in molded sections of 1.0–2.0 mm, at the expense of tensile stiffness. Because PMMA is hygroscopic, drying control is more demanding than for neat PLA; however, the PMMA-rich domains reduce post-mold shrinkage anisotropy as measured by ASTM D955 and improve resistance to edge chipping in secondary trimming operations.
Compared with an impact-modified PLA containing no PMMA, the alloy retains a higher heat deflection response under ASTM D648 and a more consistent low-gloss surface. Compared with a standard PLA/PMMA alloy without an impact modifier, the notched Izod values shift from approximately 30–50 J/m to 60–120 J/m, while tensile modulus drops from 2.8–3.4 GPa to 2.2–2.9 GPa. Because the impact modifier reduces transparency, the grade is not suitable for applications requiring optical clarity; unmodified PLA/PMMA or neat PMMA should be selected in those cases. This product is also not a drop-in replacement for ABS, because the continuous-use temperature under load and the melt toughness after humid aging are different and must be validated using ISO 75-2 and instrumented part testing.
When pre-drying is omitted or the resin is stored in an environment above 60% RH, PLA/PMMA alloys can undergo hydrolysis at melt processing temperatures. Pellets should be dried at 70–80 °C for 4–6 h in a desiccant dryer with a dew point no higher than −40 °C to reach a moisture content below 250 ppm. Hopper residence at drying temperature should not exceed 2 h because pellet fusion can occur. On an injection molding machine, a low-shear general-purpose screw with a compression ratio of 2.2:1–2.8:1 and a polished chromed screw surface reduces adhesion and melt stagnation. The feed throat should remain cool and dry, and the hopper should be covered when ambient dew point exceeds 10 °C.Compounders should target melt temperatures of 180–210 °C for this alloy class. Barrel profiles from throat to nozzle are typically set at 170 °C, 180 °C, 190 °C, 195 °C, and 200 °C; nozzle set point should not exceed 205 °C unless validated on the specific molding line. At melt temperatures above 220 °C, total residence time should be limited to 10 min or less. Long residence above 15 min at 230 °C can produce lactide-rich degradation products and a measurable reduction in molecular weight. Screw speeds of 100–200 rpm are appropriate for 25–40 mm injection screws; shear heating can exceed 15 °C per 100 rpm in unfilled amorphous blends. Back pressure of 0.3–0.7 MPa is used to maintain shot control without excessive shear work. For twin-screw re-compounding or additive masterbatch dilution, a corotating twin-screw extruder with an L/D ratio of 32:1–44:1 and vacuum venting at −0.08 MPa to −0.09 MPa is recommended.
The most common processing failure is moisture-driven hydrolysis, not thermal degradation. A material lot with 400 ppm moisture may still plasticize and fill a cavity but often shows reduced melt strength and surface silver streaking. For this reason, moisture should be verified by ISO 15512:2019 or Karl Fischer titration before first use and after any open storage interval exceeding 24 h. Processors should also record actual melt temperature using an insertion probe, because infrared barrel set points may underestimate shear-induced temperature rise in the check-ring zone.
Thin-wall electronic housings and appliance covers molded in this grade are expected to show improved notched impact response under ASTM D256 and improved multi-axial impact response under ASTM D5420 relative to unmodified PLA. The improvement is most relevant in screw-boss, snap-fit, and edge-clip features, where unmodified PLA can exhibit brittle fastening cracks during assembly. The PMMA component also reduces edge-chip sensitivity during secondary drilling or punching operations. However, the trade-off is a lower tensile modulus in the range of 2.2–2.9 GPa versus 3.0–3.5 GPa for unmodified PLA. Snap-fit designs transferred from PLA should be reevaluated using measured flexural modulus from ASTM D790 and not by direct dimensional equivalence.
Compared with unmodified PLA, mold shrinkage according to ASTM D955 is comparable at 0.004–0.006 mm/mm in flow, but post-molding warpage is generally lower because the amorphous PMMA phase suppresses anisotropic shrinkage. For thin-wall parts with nominal wall thickness of 1.2 mm, mold temperature should remain at 25–40 °C to avoid excessive crystallinity and ejection distortion. If the part requires a matte surface, a textured cavity with a draft angle of at least 1.5° is recommended. If the part requires ultrasonic welding, the welding horn amplitude and collapse distance must be revalidated because impact-modified PLA/PMMA alloys may absorb more ultrasonic energy than unmodified PLA.
| Property and test method | Unmodified PLA | Unmodified PLA/PMMA alloy | RTP 2099 X 115375 B family-typical |
|---|---|---|---|
| Density, ASTM D792 | 1.24–1.26 g/cm³ | 1.25–1.28 g/cm³ | 1.24–1.27 g/cm³ |
| Tensile strength at yield, ASTM D638 | 55–65 MPa | 45–60 MPa | 40–55 MPa |
| Tensile modulus, ASTM D638 | 3.0–3.5 GPa | 2.8–3.4 GPa | 2.2–2.9 GPa |
| Notched Izod at 23 °C, ASTM D256 | 20–30 J/m | 30–50 J/m | 60–120 J/m |
| Heat deflection temperature, 0.45 MPa, ASTM D648 | 50–60 °C | 60–75 °C | 55–70 °C |
| Mold shrinkage in flow, ASTM D955 | 0.004–0.006 mm/mm | 0.003–0.005 mm/mm | 0.004–0.006 mm/mm |
Published data for this specific lot is limited; the values above are compiled from publicly available ranges for PLA, PLA/PMMA, and impact-modified PLA/PMMA compounds. They must not be used as commercial specification limits. A lot-specific certificate of analysis should be obtained before tooling is cut or production is released.
The term bio-based refers to carbon origin, not automatically to biodegradability or industrial compostability. PLA content may be certified by ASTM D6866-21 Method B or ISO 16620-2:2019; the PMMA and impact-modifier fractions are typically petroleum-derived unless an explicit mass-balance certificate is supplied. This distinction is operationally important in markets where EN 13432 or ASTM D6400 claims are required for final articles. The alloy should not be labeled as compostable without additional certification covering the complete formulation, including colorants and processing aids.
| Assessment | Method or requirement | Status for RTP 2099 X 115375 B |
|---|---|---|
| Biogenic carbon fraction | ASTM D6866-21 / ISO 16620-2:2019 | Lot-specific radiocarbon certificate required; do not infer from PLA mass fraction alone. |
| Melt moisture content | ISO 15512:2019 or Karl Fischer titration | Target below 250 ppm; verify before first use and after open storage. |
| Density verification | ASTM D792 | Use as incoming resin lot verification only; not a substitute for mechanical data. |
| RoHS restrictions | RoHS 2011/65/EU | Supplier certificate required; no universal exemption applies to bio-based polymers. |
| REACH SVHC declaration | Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 | Written declaration required for European Union market placement. |
| Food-contact status | FDA 21 CFR 177.1520 or equivalent | Not granted automatically; end-use validation and supplier confirmation required. |