| Код ТН ВЭД | 330221 |
В качестве аккредитованного Stratasys Rigur Rigid Opaque PolyJet 3D Printing Polymer Combination: Primary: VERO BLACKPLUS RGD875; Второстепенная: завод TANGOBLACKPLUS FLX980 /TANGOPLUS FLX930, мы соблюдаем строгие протоколы качества - каждая партия подвергается строгим испытаниям для обеспечения последовательных стандартов эффективности и безопасности.
| Упаковка | |
| Доставка | |
| Хранение |
In the Rigur rigid opaque PolyJet combination, VeroBlackPlus RGD875 forms the rigid phase while TangoBlackPlus FLX980 or TangoPlus FLX930 supplies the elastomeric phase. In consumer wearable and handheld electronics enclosures, the two phases are jetted within one build so that a rigid black housing receives an integrated elastomeric button membrane, gasket, or strap anchor without secondary bonding. The RGD875 phase is specified by the manufacturer at Shore D 83–86, tensile strength 50–65 MPa per ASTM D638-14, flexural strength 75–110 MPa per ASTM D790-17, and flexural modulus 2,200–3,200 MPa per ASTM D790-17. The FLX980 or FLX930 phase is specified at Shore A 26–28, tensile strength 0.8–1.5 MPa, and elongation at break 170–220% per ASTM D412-16. For a wrist-worn wearable prototype, the housing is generated at 16 µm layer height while a Shore A 40 digital material button bladder is jetted in the same build through the DM engine, which varies voxel-level deposition of RGD875 and FLX980 rather than creating a bulk mixture. Support is removed with a high-pressure water jet at 50–80 bar, and the process is constrained by the low tear resistance of the pure elastomer phase: walls below 0.8 mm in Shore A 27 regions can perforate during jetting, and blind clip cavities below 1.5 mm can retain support gel that artificially raises durometer before post-cure. The cured polymer article falls under the heavy-metal restrictions of RoHS 2011/65/EU, but no skin-contact or biocompatibility claim is published under ISO 10993 for this specific RGD875/FLX980 combination. Snaps and button blisters are validated on a tensile test frame at 100 mm/min with force stability expected within ±0.3 N across 100 cycles for a 1.0 mm wall, though published data for this exact configuration is limited and production-target verification under ASTM D638-14 and ASTM D2240-15 is required.
Hospital-based anatomical modeling laboratories select the RGD875/FLX980 combination when a patient-specific bony structure must be printed as a rigid opaque analogue while adjacent soft tissue is printed as an elastomeric structure within the same job. The source imaging stack is segmented from DICOM data at a slice interval of 0.5–1.0 mm, and the bone surface is exported as a stereolithography file for the rigid phase. The RGD875 bone analogue is jetted at 16 µm layer height to preserve cortical landmark resolution, while the FLX980 soft-tissue analogue is jetted adjacently at Shore A 26–28 or as a Shore A 40 digital material if greater dissection resistance is required. On a PolyJet system with dual tray capacity, the two phases are UV-cured in situ and the interface is formed by droplet-level interlocking, which removes the delamination plane associated with adhesive assembly. Support removal from tortuous vascular or nerve volumes uses a water jet at 40–70 bar; elastomer branches below 0.6 mm are vulnerable to perforation, so segmentation is dilated by 0.2–0.3 mm before printing to reinforce those structures. The printed model is handled as a non-sterile anatomical reference, governed by design-control procedures under ISO 13485:2016 when fabricated in a hospital quality system, and it does not require ISO 10993 certification unless it enters a sterile field. Where the model is used for preoperative rehearsal, the build sheet is reviewed for layer-to-layer tensile discontinuities under ASTM D638-14 because a digital material interface can show lower elongation at break than either pure phase; published data for the exact RGD875/FLX980 interface is limited, so sacrificial dog-bone specimens are printed in the same build for mechanical verification. Dimensional tolerance on a calibrated system is typically within ±0.1 mm for features above 50 mm, while features below 10 mm may require a compensation factor of +0.15 mm to offset shrinkage. Unsealed FLX980 surfaces can retain solvent-wiped pigments and low-molecular-weight residues, so a clear non-reactive coating is applied only when the clinical workflow demands repeated cleaning.
During automotive wire-harness clip and grommet prototyping, the RGD875/FLX980 system exposes the tension between rigid snap geometry and elastomeric anti-rattle compliance. The clip body is generated in RGD875 because the material provides Shore D 83–86 and flexural modulus 2,200–3,200 MPa per ASTM D790-17; the grommet collar is generated in FLX980 or a Shore A 40–60 digital material to fill hole tolerances and damp vibration. The build is processed at 27 µm layer height for faster firewall, trunk, and instrument-panel iterations, followed by water-jet support removal at 60–80 bar. Orientation is process-critical: the snap beam is aligned with the X-axis rather than the Z-axis because Z-stacked FLX980 interlayers beneath the beam can reduce snap engagement force through uncontrolled interlayer shear. Vibration testing follows ISO 16750-3 for interior service profiles, but continuous engine-bay exposure is outside the published thermal boundary because RGD875 heat deflection temperature is specified at 45–50 °C under 0.45 MPa. Insertion and extraction cycling is performed for 50 cycles at 100 mm/min, with acceptance limits derived from production PP/POM baseline parts rather than from this digital material alone. The elastomer collar is evaluated for compression set under ASTM D395-16; Shore A 27 FLX980 collars show greater permanent deformation than Shore A 60 digital material collars under identical load, so grommets requiring retained radial force above 5 N after 24 h at 23 °C are specified at Shore A 60. In-cabin parts must also pass the vehicle manufacturer’s odour and fogging specifications, and uncured residue from inadequate support removal can contribute volatile compounds, so parts are rinsed and UV post-cured before delivery. The resulting clip set functions as a single-build replacement for a multi-component injection-moulded assembly in engineering validation, not as a production substitute for PP or PA66.
For orthotic insole and midsole prototyping, the digital material gradient between FLX930 and RGD875 produces distinct load-bearing zones without adhesive lamination. Pure FLX930 is specified at Shore A 26–28, tensile strength 0.8–1.5 MPa, and elongation at break 170–220% per ASTM D412-16, while RGD875 inserts are used only at the heel counter or shank position where flexural modulus 2,200–3,200 MPa is required. Digital material ratios generating Shore A 40, 50, 60, and 85 are printed by varying the deposition ratio of RGD875 to FLX980/FLX930 in the DM engine, with each ratio jetted as a voxel matrix rather than a homogeneous bulk mixture. The build is performed at 16 µm layer height to reduce plantar-surface layer lines, and gel support is removed with a water jet at 40–60 bar; the insole is then dried under vacuum at 23–25 °C for 24 h to prevent moisture uptake from shifting durometer readings. Hardness is verified with ASTM D2240-15 after conditioning for 48 h at 23 °C and 50% RH, and readings are taken on flat zones at least 6 mm thick because the digital material skin layer can read one Shore A step lower on thin sections. Compression set is measured under ASTM D395-16 method B at 23 °C for 24 h; unreinforced FLX930-rich zones may show compression set above 20%, so a heel-strike simulator protocol of 100,000 steps is applied to establish creep recovery before prototype validation. Published dynamic fatigue data for the exact RGD875/FLX930 digital gradient is limited, so the design is derated by limiting peak plantar pressure to 300 kPa in elastomer-only zones and transferring higher loads to Shore A 85 or RGD875 stiffening elements. The final orthotic prototype is not automatically a medical device substitute and falls outside FDA 21 CFR 820 unless the provider submits it as a custom orthotic under the relevant device classification; material safety documentation follows the supplier’s REACH declaration for cured polymer articles. Table 1 summarizes the Shore A gradient used in this application.
| Digital material ratio | Nominal Shore A | Tensile response | Footwear zone | Test standard |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLX930-dominant | 26–28 | 0.8–1.5 MPa, 170–220% elongation | pressure relief | ASTM D412-16, ASTM D2240-15 |
| RGD875/FLX980 mid-range | 40–60 | reduced elongation, increased tear resistance | forefoot pad, arch support | ASTM D624-12, ASTM D2240-15 |
| RGD875/FLX980 high-rigid | 85 | approaches rigid phase, low creep | heel counter, shank | ASTM D790-17, ASTM D395-16 |
A recurring failure mode in collaborative robot gripper fingers and vacuum cup adapters is the separation of the soft contact pad from the rigid mounting flange during reversing shear loads. The RGD875/FLX980 combination addresses this by printing the rigid flange and Shore A 26–28 FLX980 contact lip as a droplet-interlocked single body, eliminating mechanical clamping of rubber pads. The rigid flange is jetted at 16 µm layer height to maintain the ISO 9409-1 tool-plate hole pattern, while the compliant lip is printed with a wall thickness of 1.2–1.5 mm to resist peeling. The process boundary is the undercut geometry: unsupported elastomer overhangs below 45° require sacrificial gel support that must be removed carefully at 40–60 bar, because higher pressure can delaminate the FLX980 lip from the RGD875 body at the inter-material interface. Contact pressure distribution is tested under ISO/TS 15066 for collaborative operation, and Shore A consistency is checked with ASTM D2240-15; edge readings can drift by ±1 Shore A if the UV lamp intensity is not calibrated across the build bed. In a pick-and-place trial of 500,000 cycles at 0.5 Hz, the FLX980 lip may show leading-edge abrasion, so a wear allowance of 0.2 mm is added to the lip geometry. The material combination is not specified for direct food contact, and any gripper used in food packaging requires an indirect-contact barrier film or a food-grade cover compliant with EU 10/2011. The printed end-effector is intended for industrial and laboratory automation, where the digital-material lip absorbs part tolerance variation up to ±0.4 mm across a sheet-metal panel stack; published shear-strength retention data for this exact interface is limited, and batch validation under ASTM D624-12 tear testing is required.
In short-run production fixtures, seal nests and modular locator pads use RGD875 as the dimensionally stable base and FLX980 or FLX930 as the contact pad, seal lip, or clamp cushion. The base is built at 27 µm layer height with RGD875 because Shore D 83–86 and flexural modulus 2,200–3,200 MPa maintain datum stability, while the contact surfaces are printed in Shore A 40–60 digital material to protect polished or coated workpieces. The digital material transition is placed at least 1.0 mm below the contact plane, because a transition line at the surface creates a micro-gap that retains cutting fluid and distorts seal compression. Support removal is performed with a water jet at 50–70 bar, and the fixture is dried for 12 h at 25 °C before dimensional inspection because FLX930 can absorb airborne moisture that shifts compression behavior by up to 5% in high-humidity assembly shops. Seal rings and vacuum cups printed from FLX930 are tested for tear resistance under ASTM D624-12 and for Shore A under ASTM D2240-15; compared with moulded polyurethane or liquid silicone rubber, the pure elastomer phase has lower tear strength, so seal groove depth is limited to 0.8 mm and gland fill is held below 15–20% to avoid over-compression and shear failure at assembly. Fixtures comply with the dimensional control clauses of ISO 9001:2015 and the supplier’s REACH and RoHS declarations, but continuous immersion in ketone, chlorinated, or aromatic hydrocarbon cleaning agents is outside the compatibility envelope because the elastomer phase can swell and lose Shore A hardness; solvent exposure requires compatibility testing under ISO 175:2010. The final fixture is a bridge tool or prototype assembly aid, not a replacement for hardened steel or anodized aluminium production nests when cycle counts exceed 100,000 insertions or when abrasive workpiece edges are present. Because the FLX930 phase is not vulcanized and does not develop the crosslinked network of an injection-moulded thermoset, fixture maintenance intervals must be set by periodic ASTM D2240-15 durometer screening.
Конкурентная Stratasys Rigur жесткая непрозрачная PolyJet 3D печатающая комбинация полимера: первичная: VERO BLACKPLUS RGD875; Второе: TANGOBLACKPLUS FLX980 /TANGOPLUS FLX930 цены, которые соответствуют вашему бюджету - гибкие условия и индивидуальные котировки для каждого заказа.
Для получения образцов, цен или более подробной информации свяжитесь с нами по адресу +8618136850665 или отправить по почте admin@ascent-chem.com.
Мы ответим вам как можно скорее.
Телефон: +8618136850665
Электронная почта: admin@ascent-chem.com
Гибкие условия оплаты, конкурентоспособные цены, первоклассное обслуживание — обращайтесь прямо сейчас!
Stratasys Rigur Rigid Opaque PolyJet 3D Printing Polymer Combination is configured as a dual-resin digital material in which the primary rigid phase is VeroBlackPlus RGD875 and the secondary elastomeric phase is TangoBlackPlus FLX980 or TangoPlus FLX930. The combination is not supplied as a single premixed container; it is formed inside PolyJet printheads that are capable of simultaneous jetting, droplet-level mixing, and in-line UV curing. Compatible production platforms include the Objet260 Connex3, Objet350 Connex3, Objet500 Connex3, and J750/J735 multi-material systems when operated in High Quality or High Speed modes with layer thicknesses from 16 µm to 30 µm. The resulting material is opaque, dark in appearance, and rigid enough for dimensionally stable functional prototypes; the Tango-series secondary phase provides strain tolerance not present in a pure VeroBlackPlus build. Typical application fields include snap-fit validation, jigs, fixtures, covers, consumer product appearance models, and low-volume manufacturing aids. The resin code pairing “Primary: VERO BLACKPLUS RGD875; Secondary: TANGOBLACKPLUS FLX980 / TANGOPLUS FLX930” is the exact configuration recorded in the printer preparation software for this rigid opaque digital blend.
The function of the secondary Tango-series phase is to shift the failure mode of the opaque rigid part away from low-strain brittle fracture. For the pure primary resin VeroBlackPlus RGD875, published datasheet bands include tensile strength of 50–65 MPa under ASTM D638-14, elongation at break between 10% and 25%, flexural strength of 75–110 MPa under ASTM D790-17, and Shore D hardness of 83–86 under ASTM D2240-15. Those values describe a stiff opaque PolyJet photopolymer with limited elongation. TangoBlackPlus FLX980 and TangoPlus FLX930 report Shore A hardness of 26–28 and elongation at break from 170% to 220% under ASTM D638-14. When these resin classes are digitally mixed, the resulting mechanical response lies between the two boundaries: tensile modulus is reduced, and strain at failure is increased relative to the pure primary resin. The exact value is controlled by the programmed ratio of primary to secondary resin, and published data for this specific combination is limited. Batch-level verification should use printed tensile bars conforming to ASTM D638-14 Type IV dimensions and flexural bars conforming to ASTM D790-17.
| Resin code | Phase role | Typical datasheet property band |
|---|---|---|
| VeroBlackPlus RGD875 | rigid opaque matrix | 50–65 MPa tensile strength (ASTM D638-14); 10–25% elongation at break; 75–110 MPa flexural strength (ASTM D790-17); Shore D 83–86 (ASTM D2240-15) |
| TangoBlackPlus FLX980 | elastomeric impact modifier | Shore A 26–28; elongation at break 170–220% (ASTM D638-14) |
| TangoPlus FLX930 | elastomeric impact modifier | Shore A 26–28; elongation at break 170–220% (ASTM D638-14) |
The selection of TangoBlackPlus FLX980 versus TangoPlus FLX930 affects the opacity and colour consistency of the final blend. TangoBlackPlus FLX980 supplies a black elastomeric phase that maintains a more uniform dark appearance in thin-wall sections. TangoPlus FLX930 is visually lighter; when it is used, the black primary phase dominates the bulk opacity, but sidewalls and thin bosses may exhibit a slight colour shift under extended UV exposure. Appearance-critical parts should be evaluated under ASTM G154-23 fluorescent UV exposure if long-term lightfastness matters.
For dark opaque functional prototypes with snap-fit latch arms, living hinges, or press-fit bosses, the Rigur combination is commonly printed in High Quality mode at 16 µm layer thickness with a matte surface finish, then cleaned on a water-jet support-removal station. Support material removal should be followed by dimensional inspection because the elastomeric phase can permit slight elastic recovery after pressure washing; if a rigid jig is used during measurement, a relaxation interval of 4 h at 23 °C ± 2 °C and 50% ± 10% RH before final measurement reduces seating error. For formal datasheet comparison, conditioning should follow ASTM D618-21. In end-of-arm tooling inserts, the material is selected when repeated part contact requires higher impact tolerance than pure VeroBlackPlus but the component must remain opaque and non-marring. On production floors, the combination is most stable when resin drawers are maintained within the printer’s specified temperature envelope, because Tango-series viscosity drift alters droplet volume and can produce a batch-to-batch shift in effective shore hardness if the same printhead is run without scheduled purging.
Water absorption for the pure primary resin is reported in the range of 1.1–1.5% after 24 h immersion according to ASTM D570-98. The elastomeric secondary phase can absorb additional moisture, so the digital blend should be handled as a moisture-sensitive workpiece when post-processing includes water-jet cleaning. Parts measured immediately after water-jet cleaning tend to exhibit dimensional expansion from absorbed water at the surface; a conditioning interval at 23 °C ± 2 °C and 50% ± 10% RH for at least 4 h following cleaning reduces measurement variation. When the workshop relative humidity exceeds 60%, the conditioning period should be extended and parts should be stored in sealed polyethylene bags with desiccant after drying.
Water-jet cleaning is the standard workflow for removing support material from dark opaque digital blend parts. The high opacity of VeroBlackPlus RGD875 masks internal residual support in thin channels; inspection should use backlighting or borescope equipment rather than visual surface checks alone. Dimensional tolerance is affected by support-removal pressure and by the orientation of the part. Vertical sidewalls retain better feature definition than overhanging surfaces; for holes smaller than 5 mm, support removal without internal inspection can leave residue that later acts as a stress concentrator in snap-fit assemblies. Operators should specify the post-cleaning measurement location on the drawing and compare results with the same orientation printed in pure VeroBlackPlus to isolate the effect of the elastomeric secondary phase.
Support-removal pressure should remain in the low- to medium-pressure range typical of water-jet stations; excessive pressure can deform unsupported thin features before the cured digital blend reaches its final post-processing stiffness. The interaction is more pronounced when the secondary phase concentration is high because local elastomeric domains reduce the resistance of the part to short-term creep under the jet nozzle. In contrast, purely rigid VeroBlackPlus parts can tolerate higher nozzle pressure without visible edge roll-off. This difference is a useful process indicator: if a dark opaque part shows scalloped edges after support removal, the operator should first reduce pressure and verify whether the distortion persists before adjusting the resin ratio.
Build orientation determines the arrangement of support contact points and the direction of the jetting layers. For snap-fit features, orienting the snap-arm axis parallel to the X–Y plane generally preserves the intended beam stiffness because the tensile cross-section is printed more uniformly across the build envelope. Orienting the snap-arm axis vertically produces stack-like layer boundaries along the bending axis; this can create premature failure at layer interfaces when the part is subjected to repeated insertion. These orientation effects are measurable by comparing notched and unnotched test coupons printed in both axes before committing to a production aid.
| Process variable | Controlled condition | Observed effect when outside control band |
|---|---|---|
| Layer thickness | 16 µm High Quality; 30 µm High Speed | surface finish degradation; visible step lines on shallow snap arms |
| Resin reservoir temperature | printer-controlled set point | viscosity drift alters droplet volume and final shore hardness |
| Post-cleaning conditioning | 23 °C ± 2 °C, 50% ± 10% RH, 4 h minimum | dimensional expansion from absorbed water; false dimensional nonconformance |
| Support removal pressure | low-pressure water jet | thin elastomeric secondary domains deform; micro-pitting or loss of edge definition |
The table entries are process-control points derived from general PolyJet operation and the measured behavior of the constituent resins; they are not a substitute for equipment-specific validation. Resin lot numbers, the selected mixing ratio, and the post-cleaning conditioning interval should be recorded in the build log because the digital blend is not assigned a standalone datasheet.
The selection criterion is centered on the strain-to-failure requirement. Pure VeroBlackPlus RGD875 is appropriate when the part requires maximum stiffness and dimensional rigidity under low-strain load, but it can fracture at feature corners when insertion force is high. The Rigur combination is preferred when the assembly event is repeated or when the part contains shallow snap arms that must survive multiple cycles; the trade-off is a reduction in elastic modulus relative to the pure primary resin. Because the secondary phase is elastomeric, the final blend also exhibits lower creep resistance and a more pressure-sensitive surface finish than a single-phase rigid resin; scratches caused by handling may be more visible on the dark opaque surface.
Compared with Digital ABS II, the Rigur combination is generally processed on the same Connex hardware, but the resin pair uses a Tango-series secondary rather than the ABS-like digital material set. Published property bands are separate, and direct substitution should not proceed without comparison of ASTM D638-14 and ASTM D790-17 tensile and flexural data from the same build orientation. Compared with VeroClear or transparent PolyJet materials, the dark opaque combination provides better front-surface contrast for optical inspection of part edges but cannot be used for light-transmission or fluid-visualisation prototypes. Compared with Agilus30 or other elastomeric PolyJet materials, the Rigur combination is stiff and dimensionally stable, but it does not provide rubber-like recovery or high elongation.
In Connex-style PolyJet systems, the digital material ratio is assigned by the software and cannot be directly verified from the final part without destructive testing. Operators may use shore hardness as an indirect indicator of ratio drift. A part built from the Rigur combination should be measurably harder than a pure Tango-series part but softer than a pure VeroBlackPlus part. If the shore hardness is outside the expected band for the chosen ratio, the printer should be checked for missing nozzles, uncured resin accumulation, or incorrect resin-code assignment before further production.
Continuous load-bearing service above 45–50 °C is not recommended unless prototype-specific thermal deflection testing has been performed. Published data for this specific configuration under ASTM D648-18 is limited; therefore, thermal evaluation should be conducted on printed coupons conditioned per ASTM D618-21 before any tooling deployment.
At the post-processing bench, exposure to ketone-based solvents, concentrated alcohol baths, or heated aqueous alkaline solutions can degrade the acrylate polymer network and should be avoided unless a chemical compatibility trial is performed. Mild soap-and-water cleaning is acceptable for surface oils; ultrasonic baths are not recommended for thin-walled digital blend parts because cavitation can preferentially erode the rubbery secondary domains and create micro-pitting. If staining from assembly lubricant is encountered, a short wipe with a weak isopropanol solution may be used, but the part should be rinsed and rested for 2 h at room temperature before installation to allow surface stabilisation.