| Код ТН ВЭД | 781244 |
В качестве аккредитованного резиноподобного PolyJet 3D-полимерного сочетания Stratasys Rigur: первичный: TANGOPLUS FLX930 /TANGOBLACKPLUS FLX980; Вторичное: завод RIGUR, мы соблюдаем строгие протоколы качества - каждая партия подвергается строгим испытаниям для обеспечения последовательных стандартов эффективности и безопасности.
| Упаковка | |
| Доставка | |
| Хранение |
Stratasys TangoPlus FLX930 and TangoBlackPlus FLX980 are jetted as the elastomeric primary phase, while Rigur is assigned to the rigid secondary phase in multi-material PolyJet builds. The combination is not a melt-blended compound; phase distribution is controlled by droplet-level digital material dithering. Layer thickness on current PolyJet systems is typically selected between 16 µm and 30 µm, depending on the proportion of flexible phase in a given zone. Rigur contributes latch stiffness and geometric stability, whereas the Tango pair contributes Shore A 26–28 compliance and tear-limited stretch. Parent-grade TangoPlus FLX930 datasheet values include tensile strength of 0.8–1.5 MPa under ASTM D412, elongation at break of 170–220% under ASTM D412, tear strength of 2.5–4.0 kgf/cm under ASTM D624 Die C, and compression set of 0.2–0.5% under ASTM D395-18 Method B. Published mechanical data for the exact TangoPlus/Rigur digital blend remain limited; design values below are therefore anchored to parent-grade datasheets and test-coupon validation rather than a single blended-filament specification.
Display gaskets in wearable diagnostic monitors require compression recovery across repeated battery-access and sensor-cable routing. For a housing printed with Rigur frames and a TangoPlus FLX930 gasket bead, the design envelope is defined by compression set measured according to ASTM D395-18 Method B at 70 °C for 22 h, with the bead cross-section not less than 0.8 mm in width. Rigur latch arms with nominal wall thickness of 1.2 mm and deflection of 0.35 mm to 0.50 mm retain the display without screw bosses. The soft bead is compressed to 15–25% strain against the lens or housing lip, sufficient for immersion testing under IEC 60529 IPX7 when the groove flatness across the sealing path is held to 0.05 mm. The transition between rigid and elastomeric phases is printed as a 0.5 mm digital material ramp; sharp boundaries at the gasket root are avoided because tensile tear at jetted ridges initiates at the phase interface during ejection. Support removal in narrow gasket grooves uses water-jet pressure below 3 bar and a standoff of 50 mm; higher pressure tears TangoPlus sections thinner than 0.6 mm. Prior to adhesive bonding of a protective glass, TangoPlus surfaces are plasma-treated at 80 W for 30 s to raise surface energy above 50 mN/m, with contact angle verified by ASTM D5946-17. The Rigur frame is printed at 30 µm layer thickness for throughput, while the gasket bead is printed at 16 µm to reduce stair-stepping on the sealing rib. Leakage after assembly is monitored by pressure-decay testing with a threshold of 0.05 bar/min for 30 s dwell after pressurisation to 0.2 bar.
The boot body is produced from TangoBlackPlus FLX980 because the black grade masks handling marks in cabin and exterior lighting mock-ups, while the clip flange is printed in Rigur to seat into a sheet-metal slot. Datasheet tear strength for the TangoBlackPlus FLX980 parent grade under ASTM D624 Die C is in the range 2.5 kgf/cm to 4.0 kgf/cm. This limits the allowable tear energy during harness insertion: the boot opening is enlarged by 10% relative to the connector cross-section, and the transition radius is not reduced below 0.6 mm. Terminal retention clips in Rigur are evaluated for snap insertion force at 50 mm/min according to ASTM D638-14 using a Type IV specimen, with insertion force held below 20 N to avoid stressing the adjacent soft phase. The continuous service boundary is 50 °C, based on the heat deflection temperature of the Tango phase under 0.45 MPa; underhood exposure above 60 °C is outside the validated envelope. Wire insulation plasticiser compatibility is screened by immersion in insulation jacket extract according to ISO 1817 for 72 h at 23 °C. Support remnants at the inner bore create a processing bottleneck: boot bodies printed with residual support edges show tear propagation from the remnant edge under 15% strain. Visual inspection at 10× magnification after support removal is therefore mandatory before installation testing. Vibration exposure on prototype harness boards follows ISO 16750-3 profiles with 10–50 Hz swept sine and 1.0 g acceleration, but the material combination is not qualified as a production underhood elastomer.
Compression set after repeated reprocessing defines layer thickness in laparoscopic training phantoms. TangoPlus FLX930 is selected for the external abdominal simulation layer and Rigur for internal rib-cage landmarks. The elastomer is printed at 1.0 mm thickness and conditioned at 23 °C for 24 h before first use; compression set measured according to ASTM D395-18 Method B remains below 0.5% for the parent grade, but the presence of Rigur constraints raises local stiffness at the interface. The phantom is chemical-disinfected with quaternary ammonium compounds at 2% concentration and 22 °C for 10 min, followed by distilled water rinse. Alcohol soak beyond 10 min is not recommended because surface microcracking at the digital-material boundary has been observed on test coupons under 20× optical inspection. This configuration is not a body-contact certified device; cytotoxicity screening follows ISO 10993-5 only as an internal material-release gate, and the elastomer is not rated for autoclave exposure at 134 °C because that exceeds the heat deflection temperature of both phases under load. When rib-cage landmarks are printed in Rigur with 0.8 mm wall thickness, the tactile mismatch against cortical bone remains high; the phantom therefore serves instrument path planning rather than cortical stiffness simulation. Repeated instrument insertion with an 8 Fr catheter at 30 mm/min is used to establish superficial damage thresholds, and any visible tear at the access port requires reprinting before the next training session.
In bellow-type gripper fingers, TangoPlus FLX930 forms the pressure boundary and Rigur forms the hub, bolt flange, and vacuum-channel housing. The Tango membrane is printed at 1.0–1.5 mm wall thickness and actuated between 20 kPa and 40 kPa pneumatic pressure at 0.2–0.5 Hz, with strain kept below 30% during inflation. Parent-grade elongation at break is 170–220% under ASTM D412, but cyclic fatigue in this application is governed by tear initiation at support-removal nicks, not ultimate elongation. Tear strength of the parent TangoPlus is 2.5–4.0 kgf/cm under ASTM D624 Die C. The Rigur hub is designed with a flange thickness of 2.0 mm and through-holes with a chamfer of 0.3 mm to prevent cutting the soft membrane during pressure reversal. Pneumatic fittings are bonded with a primerless cyanoacrylate; lap shear coupons are conditioned at 23 °C and 50% RH for 48 h prior to pull testing at 10 mm/min under ASTM D3163-01. Pressure-decay testing is performed at 50 kPa with a leak threshold of 0.5 kPa/min. Published data for the exact TangoPlus/Rigur digital interface under cyclic pressure are limited; benchmark testing therefore uses a minimum of 5 printed fingers per geometry and records crack location after every 1,000 cycles. The dominant failure mode observed in bench testing is not membrane burst but radial tear at the bellow root, where the digital material gradient should be no narrower than 0.5 mm and the root radius should not fall below 0.4 mm.
Footwear outsole traction-element prototyping places Rigur in a load-spreading shank and lug-mount plate, while TangoPlus FLX930 supplies discrete flexing traction nodes for quick-change design iterations. TangoPlus is not a production outsole rubber; its abrasion resistance is below vulcanised styrene-butadiene rubber and is not specified under DIN 53516. The printed midsole assembly is used for wet-coefficient-of-friction screening on ceramic tile according to ASTM F2913-17 at a normal force of 500 N, but the elastomer nodes show visible surface roughening after 50 test cycles. Rigur plate thickness of 1.5 mm is sufficient for longitudinal flex stiffness comparisons when tested in a three-point bend at 5 mm/min. The soft nodes are printed with a truncated cone geometry of 3.0 mm base diameter and 2.0 mm height, with centre-to-centre spacing of 6.0 mm; this provides node shear displacement during strike without tearing at the node base. The digital-material transition under each node is ramped over 0.5 mm; a sharp step transition induces premature crack formation after fewer than 1,000 flex cycles. For traction-pattern comparisons, the rig is run at 1 Hz for 2,000 cycles on a wet tile bed, and the acceptance criterion is the absence of full-thickness tear at more than 10% of the nodes. Soft node recovery after cyclic compression is checked by measuring node height before and after a 24 h rest period with a non-contact profilometer; height loss greater than 0.2 mm is treated as a failed geometry.
Patient-specific phantoms are prepared from computed tomography segmentations with Rigur assigned to rib and vertebral landmarks and TangoPlus FLX930 assigned to intercostal and visceral soft-tissue volumes. The phase assignment is visual, tactile, and instrument-path related; it does not replicate the elastic modulus of cortical bone. Rigur is a rigid polymer with flexural modulus closer to 1,000–1,500 MPa by ASTM D790-17, whereas human cortical bone is commonly cited at 10–20 GPa in standard anatomical references. TangoPlus has Shore A 26–28 under ASTM D2240, comparable to soft-tissue tactile response for instrument palpation only. Interface modelling between hard and soft regions is generated through a digital-material ramp of 1.0 mm to reduce stress concentration at rib root; phantom reusability is then assessed by puncture resistance with an 8 Fr catheter at 30 mm/min. Cleaning uses neutral enzymatic detergent at 40 °C for 15 min; no autoclave or hydrogen peroxide sterilant is used because the photopolymer phases are not rated for that exposure. The phantom is an anatomical instructional model; regulatory claim is limited to short-term skin contact and is not a replacement for implant-grade silicones or thermoplastics. Build orientation is assigned so that the soft tissue surface is formed against support rather than on the top surface; top-surface release films on TangoPlus can reduce tactile consistency and leave a residual gloss boundary at the digital material interface. Each phantom is measured against the segmentation file with 0.1 mm accuracy at 3 landmark positions using blue-light scanning before acceptance for teaching use.
End-of-arm tooling pads for polypropylene bottle handling are printed as a single multi-material set: Rigur locator brackets and TangoPlus FLX930 contact pads. The pad contact face is 1.5 mm thick and the rigid back plate is 3.0 mm thick, with a bridge area of digital material extending 2.0 mm beyond the pad edge. Surface scratch testing on bottle walls uses a constant normal force of 1.2 N for 100 mm travel at 50 mm/min and is evaluated by ASTM D7027-13. Contact pads in TangoPlus reduce marring on polypropylene compared with rigid clamping elements, but the soft phase is limited to momentary contact at 40 °C; continuous exposure to blow-moulding extraction temperatures above 60 °C is outside the validated service range. Mounting brackets printed in Rigur are tapped to M4 inserts with an installation torque of 0.4 N·m, while the contact face is kept free of threaded inserts to avoid stress concentration at the rigid-soft boundary. Published data for production-line cycle life of this exact pad geometry are limited; the pad set is therefore evaluated with a 10,000-cycle bench test at 0.5 Hz before deployment. After 5,000 cycles, pad thickness loss is measured by profilometry and replacement is triggered at 0.3 mm cumulative wear. The tooling is stored away from direct UV exposure because TangoPlus surfaces yellow and embrittle under prolonged ultraviolet radiation; UV screening for prototype applications is based on ASTM G154-16 cycle tests, but long-term outdoor-rated stability is not claimed.
Конкурентная комбинация PolyJet 3D-печати Stratasys Rigur Rubber-Like PolyJet: первичная: TANGOPLUS FLX930 /TANGOBLACKPLUS FLX980; Вторичное: РЕГУРНЫЕ цены, которые соответствуют вашему бюджету - гибкие условия и индивидуальные котировки для каждого заказа.
Для получения образцов, цен или более подробной информации свяжитесь с нами по адресу +8618136850665 или отправить по почте admin@ascent-chem.com.
Мы ответим вам как можно скорее.
Телефон: +8618136850665
Электронная почта: admin@ascent-chem.com
Гибкие условия оплаты, конкурентоспособные цены, первоклассное обслуживание — обращайтесь прямо сейчас!
Configured as a multi-material PolyJet build set, the Stratasys Rigur Rubber-Like PolyJet 3D Printing Polymer Combination pairs the primary elastomeric photopolymers TANGOPLUS FLX930 and TANGOBLACKPLUS FLX980 with the secondary rigid photopolymer RIGUR. The primary materials are supplied as cartridges for rubber-like Shore A-range photopolymers; the secondary material is a polypropylene-like rigid photopolymer. The printer does not pre-blend the resins into a single homogeneous digital material. Discrete voxels of primary and secondary material are deposited and UV-cured in the same build. The combination is assigned in the PolyJet job preparation software, with the primary phase placed in seal, gasket, cushion, or grip regions and the secondary phase placed in bosses, snap-fit arms, hinge elements, or stiffening frames. Supported multi-material platforms for this configuration include the Objet500 Connex3 and the Stratasys J750/J850 series, subject to the current compatibility matrix. Published data for the combined multi-material interface is limited; performance values for the individual phases therefore provide the baseline design window.
| Property | Test method | TANGOPLUS FLX930 | TANGOBLACKPLUS FLX980 | RIGUR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hardness | ASTM D2240 / ISO 868 | 26–28 Shore A | 26–28 Shore A | 75–80 Shore D |
| Tensile strength | ASTM D638 / ISO 527 | 0.8–1.5 MPa | 0.8–1.5 MPa | 35–45 MPa |
| Elongation at break | ASTM D638 / ISO 527 | 170–220 % | 170–220 % | 40–50 % |
| Tear resistance | ASTM D624 / ISO 34-1 | 2.5–4 kg/cm | 2.5–4 kg/cm | not specified |
| Flexural modulus | ASTM D790 / ISO 178 | not applicable | not applicable | 1400–1700 MPa |
| Notched Izod impact | ASTM D256 / ISO 180 | not specified | not specified | 40–60 J/m |
| Heat deflection temperature at 0.45 MPa | ASTM D648 / ISO 75-2 | not specified | not specified | 42–48 °C |
| Compression set, 22 h at 23 °C | ASTM D395 Method B | 0.5–1.5 % | 0.5–1.5 % | not specified |
Shore A and Shore D scales are not directly subtractable. The primary materials occupy the Shore A 26–28 range, while RIGUR occupies the Shore D 75–80 range; this creates a step change in indentation resistance at the interface. The tensile strength difference between the primary and secondary phases exceeds one order of magnitude. Tensile elongation values of 170–220 % for the elastomer and 40–50 % for RIGUR impose different strain limits on the same part. When a rigid RIGUR core is embedded in a TangoPlus jacket, strain concentration occurs at the boundary; fillets and gradual thickness transitions are used to reduce interfacial stress. Because published data for the exact printed interface is limited, tensile adhesion should be characterized on printed multi-material coupons under ASTM D638 or ISO 527 with the joint plane oriented perpendicular to the tensile axis. Tear resistance of the primary Tango materials is reported at 2.5–4 kg/cm under ASTM D624, which is lower than many molded thermoplastic elastomers; sharp concave features in flexing regions should therefore be avoided.
Jetting temperature, roller engagement, and UV lamp irradiance are managed by the PolyJet platform, but differential photopolymerization shrinkage between RIGUR and the TangoPlus phase can create residual stress at the interface. When a fully encapsulated rigid core is built inside an elastomeric jacket, shrinkage of the surrounding elastomer may compress the core and produce distortion after support removal. On production-scale Connex3 and J750 systems, field observations have shown that elastomer bleed into rigid regions increases when jetting heads are near service intervals; nozzle condition verification and wiper maintenance are therefore as critical for this combination as for single-material builds. The support material for this configuration is an alkaline-soluble photopolymer; trapped support between rigid and elastomeric layers reduces interfacial peel strength and must be removed by ultrasonic immersion or directed brushing in accordance with the printer manufacturer’s support removal guidelines. Dimensional metrology should be performed after conditioning at 23 °C and 50 % RH for a minimum of 48 h because the elastomeric phase responds differently to moisture than RIGUR. ASTM D570 or ISO 62 moisture-conditioning data for the individual phases are more readily available than data for the combined structure, so part-level dimensional stability tests should be conducted before committing to production. Build orientation also influences interface strength: tensile adhesion is typically lower in the Z-direction because of interlayer photopolymer conversion gradients, and peel loads at the primary–secondary boundary should be oriented in the XY plane where possible.
Compression set for TANGOPLUS FLX930 and TANGOBLACKPLUS FLX980 is reported at 0.5–1.5 % after 22 h at 23 °C under ASTM D395 Method B. This supports short-term sealing evaluations but does not imply sustained load retention at elevated temperature. For gasket prototypes, the same test should be repeated at the intended service temperature because compression set in photopolymer elastomers increases with temperature. Tear propagation resistance, measured under ASTM D624, is 2.5–4 kg/cm for the primary materials; cut growth in high-strain diaphragms and flexing boot sections can initiate at molded-in nick lines or unradiused part edges. Design rules for this material combination therefore specify radiused corners and uniform wall thickness around elastomeric hinge zones. Chemical exposure limits differ between the two phases. RIGUR has moderate resistance to aqueous and hydrocarbon environments but should not be assumed to match injection-molded polypropylene. TANGOPLUS and TANGOBLACKPLUS are susceptible to swelling and embrittlement in ketones, esters, aromatic hydrocarbons, and strong acids. Immersion compatibility under ASTM D543 should be performed for any production sealing application. Published data for the combined interface in chemical contact is limited; environmental stress cracking at the secondary phase and swelling of the primary phase can both delaminate the interface. Continuous exposure to polar solvents and high-alkalinity cleaning solutions should be avoided unless validated on printed assemblies. Additional UV post-exposure can shift Shore A hardness and reduce elongation in the elastomeric phase, so any post-cure schedule must be applied identically to validation coupons and production parts.
When higher elongation at break and notched impact resistance are required, RIGUR is selected over the Vero family. Published values for RIGUR place tensile elongation at 40–50 % and notched Izod at 40–60 J/m, whereas Vero-family rigid materials typically report lower elongation and higher flexural modulus. The trade-off is reduced stiffness: RIGUR reports a flexural modulus of 1400–1700 MPa, below the 2000–3000 MPa range commonly associated with Vero materials. Compared with Agilus30, the TangoPlus FLX930 and TANGOBLACKPLUS FLX980 materials represent the older Tango family with Shore A 26–28 compliance and lower tear propagation resistance; Agilus30 is generally specified when higher tear strength or green-part robustness is required. This combination also differs from a homogeneous digital elastomer because the RIGUR phase creates structural zones that are not present in a single-material Tango build. The effect is similar to two-shot overmolding in injection molding, but the printed elastomer is a photopolymer rather than a thermoplastic vulcanizate. Users replacing an ABS-like core in a soft-touch design with RIGUR should verify snap-fit deflection and fatigue life because RIGUR has higher elongation but lower surface hardness than glass-filled engineered resins. Published data for this specific configuration is limited when the interface is loaded in peel or fatigue; printed validation is required.
In multi-material builds using this configuration, application validation should begin with printed coupons produced in the same build orientation and jetting mode as the production part. Typical evaluation targets include soft-touch handles, gasketed housings, vibration isolation pads, connector strain reliefs, and wearable prototypes where a rigid frame must carry an elastomeric contact surface. Seal prototypes should be tested under ASTM F37 or equivalent fluid-leakage methods, with compression set verified under ASTM D395 Method B at the actual service temperature. Vibration isolation candidates should be evaluated by dynamic mechanical analysis under ASTM E1640 or ISO 6721-1 to confirm temperature-dependent modulus before use above 40 °C. This combination is not a substitute for high-tear industrial silicone or thermoplastic polyurethane in dynamic sealing applications. The primary elastomer phase has limited high-temperature resistance; continuous service above 60 °C requires printed-part validation because RIGUR heat deflection temperature is reported at 42–48 °C at 0.45 MPa. Biocompatibility must not be assumed from bulk photopolymer data; ISO 10993 certification applies to the final printed and post-processed device, not to the raw cartridge chemistry alone. Cartridge storage should remain between 18 °C and 25 °C with light-shielded conditions per the manufacturer’s safety data sheet and handling instructions.